That is a possible use for the additional revenues generated, but I'm against additional government subsidies to private industries. If they can't compete on their own, I don't see a reason to keep bailing them out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is my idea, yes.bignick said:somebody asked earlier..what restrictions would be placed on personal production...are you going to continue modeling this after alcohol and let a certain, small amount be grown at home for personal use...ala homebrewed beer?
That's the problem with voters, they don't want to pay for anything, but public transportation is a must. It just that it ain't gonna happen until it's forced down "our" throats by some cataclysmic event.Kaith Rustaz said:That is a possible use for the additional revenues generated, but I'm against additional government subsidies to private industries. If they can't compete on their own, I don't see a reason to keep bailing them out.
I would look at the laws concerning homebrewing, and use them as a guide, while hopefully plugging and problems in the existing system.shesulsa said:I make my own wine at home and give some of it away since I do not have a license to sell it.
How do you intend on enforcing the limiting of the quantity of how much marijuana is grown for home use and what would the penalty be for those growing too much?
How do you define "ROI" for public programs? Wouldn't reduced pollution and improved abilities for everyone to get where they need to go count as "returns on investment"?Kaith Rustaz said:...provide a ROI similarly to that found in my new schools proposal.
How does "government funding" differ from "public investment"?Kaith Rustaz said:It will take some time to reverse that trend and convert them over to public investment.
That is part of it.PeachMonkey said:How do you define "ROI" for public programs? Wouldn't reduced pollution and improved abilities for everyone to get where they need to go count as "returns on investment"?
Government funding comes out of our pockets. Why should someone in California pay for a subway in Vermont?How does "government funding" differ from "public investment"?
that's quite a collection of mis-information.shesulsa said:Not that I smoke pot, but...I think I'd almost rather buy it from Mexico than the US anyway - unless we're talking Hawai'i. Yeah, that's what we need - legalize pot so that the government can supervise the farming and production of it.
GAH!
So, what about quaaludes? Don't they so essentially the same thing as alcohol just without the sick stomach? And speed - we can already purchase caffeine pills OTC anyway. I know - let's dole out cocaine so our socially inhibited population and depressed population can be alleviated of their symptoms.
Mushrooms grow wild and are not much worse on the psyche than regulated amounts of morphine. Why not them?
I don't think these can be over-emphasized. I am hornswazzled that we put people away for having or dealing pot sometimes longer than someone who committed a robbery, or, even worse, assaulted/raped/beat someone else. That, to me, is insane.Release of non-violent dope offenders from prison
The gain of these individuals' tax base back into the economy
HEMP HISTORY
Hemp is among the oldest industries on the planet, going back more than 10,000 years to the beginnings of pottery. The Columbia History of the World states that the oldest relic of human industry is a bit of hemp fabric dating back to approximately 8,000 BC.
Presidents Washington and Jefferson both grew hemp. Americans were legally bound to grow hemp during the Colonial Era and Early Republic.
In 1937 Congress passed the Marihuana Tax Act which effectively began the era of hemp prohibition. The tax and licensing regulations of the act made hemp cultivation unfeasible for American farmers. The chief promoter of the Tax Act, Harry Anslinger, began promoting anti-marijuana legislation around the world. To learn more about hemp prohibition visit http://www.JackHerer.com or check out "The Emperor Wears No Clothes" by Jack Herer
Then came World War II. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor shut off foreign supplies of "manilla hemp" fiber from the Philippines. The USDA produced a film called Hemp For Victory to encourage US farmers to grow hemp for the war effort. The US government formed War Hemp Industries and subsidized hemp cultivation. During the War and US farmers grew about a million acres of hemp across the midwest as part of that program.
After the war ended, the government quietly shut down all the hemp processing plants and the industry faded away again.
During the period from 1937 to the late 60's the US government understood and acknowledged that Industrial Hemp and marijuana were distinct varieties of the cannabis plant. Hemp is no longer recognized as distinct from marijuana since the passage of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) of 1970. This is despite the fact that a specific exemption for hemp was included in the CSA under the definition of marijuana.