MartialIntent said:
Not at all! Sir, although we differ, your viewpoints are welcome [and insightful from the world of Tai Chi]. Evidently though, my aptitude for translating an ethereal concept into the nuts and bolts is failing me!
Good luck and respects!
You are an honorable person, respects to you as well.
MartialIntent said:
No, my concern is with those arts who are more than happy to have "Spirituality Practised Here" as a <META> tag on their websites or in their mission statements but when it comes to walking the walk as it were, seem a little less vociferous and a little more reticent about what sort of spiritual mentoring / direction they might provide to those students who express an interest.
This is dishonest advertising the same as a flashing sign to gain ones attention, or in this case to gain more students. And in this case I would have to agree with you
MartialIntent said:
I'd cite two methods to clarify a school's position in respect of their spiritual sides - 1). Disavow spirituality altogether and stake no claim in respect of it's practise... At least that is honest, upfront and potential and existing students know what to expect and that independent study will be necessary if they wish to discover more. Or 2). Follow through on the spirituality claim: educate, research, gently direct and mentor students who are interested in furthering their knowledge and practise of the spiritual aspects of the art.
I would still have to say here that choice 1 is the more honest of the 2. I still do not feel it is up to the teacher of any style to teach "Spirituality". Plus I still maintain that many traditional Martial arts teacher simply do not see the 2 as different things. They train you martial arts and it is though that training that you gain the deeper understanding. It is still in my opinion up to the student
MartialIntent said:
I believe there's a subconscious image many of us have of the only truly spiritual martial artist being that fellow who stands atop the mountain breathing in rays of sun through the cap of his head - or - the berry-eating nomad [Kane in Kung Fu]. And whilst these practices may certainly inspire one to be spiritual at that level, it's not what we are in the west at least for the most part.
I know many of the new age Tai Chi people think this. I have seen them revere a teacher in a way I think can be a bit scary. This is just another area where I have a problem with the whole spiritual/religious thing in martial arts.
And as a side note, I have talked with many Chinese people, Chinese martial artists and I have even heard a Shaolin Monk speak and none of them talk like David Carradine (Kane) in Kung fu.
But you are correct this is the perception many people apparently have of martial arts today. Which is also another area that I think their brand of spirituality is destroying many a martial art today.
MartialIntent said:
No, I think diligent physical practice by us grass-roots martial artists is sufficient if done in the spirit of self-discovery to uncover a personal enlightenment and deeper awareness of the art, why we practice it, which we are as practitioners and what we can do within the framework of our art. This is my personal definition of spirituality and enlightment.
Is this "The nuts and bolts"?
This I can agree with, but I would not call it spirituality, I just call understanding.
A short story; I have a friend who has studied Aikido and Karate. He is very good at his chosen martial arts, he is, for all intensive purposes the one of the best at Karate I have ever seen. But he has stagnated and has stopped training all together, he is unable to go further or advance in anyway. I have attributed this to the fact that he absolutely refuses to do any internal work at all. No stance training, no Qi, or in his case, Ki training. He absolutely refuses to believe it can help in any way....He equates this to religion and he is fairly anti-religious.
If for no other reason the internal would help him relax and thereby potentially give him the improvement that he is searching for. And despite my attempts to show this is not religious, he refuses to change his position. As far as I can tell he no longer trains any martial arts at all, and based on his skill up to this point, I can say this is a great loss to martial arts in general. OK it was a long story.
MartialIntent said:
And of course there is no requirement whatsoever for one to label this as spirituality should one have no desire to do so.
Thank You, I think we are reaching agreement here. Or at least the agree to disagree stage if you like.
MartialIntent said:
My point is that many practitioners who *do* seek spirituality and enlightenment often are given no encouragement or mentoring to tell them that what they are already doing through enjoying dynamic physicality in their art *IS* spirituality by any other name.
I truly have no problem with this, I fully believe: if it makes you happy and doesn't hurt others than great.
If you call it a lift and I call it an elevator, big deal. You call it spirituality and I call it understanding, it makes no difference.
My problem begins with those that force their brand of religion on a martial art where either none exists or they do not understand what it already there (and it is not religion) or fear what they perceive to be a "Eastern" "non-Christian" type of training that of course must be evil, it is non-Christian. When in reality what they fear is not there in the first place.
And with Tai Chi, Qi Gong and I am beginning to fear Bagua might be next. The influx of the New age religious (Tai Chi dance and crystal show) set that are for all intensive purposes destroying the martial arts as we know them. And by the way I have talked with some people here that are in Aikido that would fall into the same group.
However, I am not saying nor do I not consider you one of these people. But this is why I have such a problem with the word spirituality being applied to martial arts.