That's why I believe anti-grappling is impossible. You can't do anti-grappling without grappling training.So again, if "anti-grappling" is also grappling, why do we need the anti.
And if striking is "anti grappling" what's wrong with just calling it a strike.
Or just generally, like someone just pointed out the obvious, "counter".
The discussion wasn't intended to be on "anti-grappling", but to discuss whether "anti-striking" is possible or not (such as someone doesn't want to learn stand up strike).
Last edited: