Looking at Systema videos and video clips, including the ones from Mr. Puzikas' site that were mentioned recently, I see a great many defenses that seem to amount to a slick way of tripping/nudging/pulling the other person to the floor. (I hope that doesn't sound dismissive--it looks very neat, and I see isolated techniques that I know and like to use in there, but as is so often the case with Systema I find myself at a loss for appropriate descriptive terms for the moves.) Many of these don't appear to be fight-enders from my vantage point.
I think of boxing having as an ideal finishing move a strong cross or hook or overhand, BJJ an arm-lock or choke, karate a strong reverse punch or a low kick to the knee or groin, etc., etc.--in these systems the overall strategy is to get to a point where such a technique can be thrown, by smart use of the jab, or good positioning on the ground, or a strong block and strong stance, etc. Of course, this is an oversimplification in each case, but I am asking: What is an 'ideal' or 'typical' finishing technique in Systema? A punch, a throw, a lock, or what? Is it that the take-downs I'm seeing would be more dangerous if the uke didn't know how to take the fall/absorb the momentum?
I hope my question is clear!
I think of boxing having as an ideal finishing move a strong cross or hook or overhand, BJJ an arm-lock or choke, karate a strong reverse punch or a low kick to the knee or groin, etc., etc.--in these systems the overall strategy is to get to a point where such a technique can be thrown, by smart use of the jab, or good positioning on the ground, or a strong block and strong stance, etc. Of course, this is an oversimplification in each case, but I am asking: What is an 'ideal' or 'typical' finishing technique in Systema? A punch, a throw, a lock, or what? Is it that the take-downs I'm seeing would be more dangerous if the uke didn't know how to take the fall/absorb the momentum?
I hope my question is clear!