Doc said:Perhaps a new thread would have been better.
Here it is:
http://www.martialtalk.com/forum/showthread.php?p=547716#post547716
Lets shift any further discussion on movement over to this thread.
Mike
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doc said:Perhaps a new thread would have been better.
Doc said:Thank you for your inquiry regarding a fairly well written and time consuming post.
BallistikMike said:Does anyone know why and what injury caused the longest lay off for prize fighters BEFORE the queensburry rule change?
Hand Sword said:Old fashioned focus mits. The gloves referred to were the ones for fighting. They just covered the hands, no wrapping, very thin. They were just for stopping the grabbing that was going on.
Andrew Green said:Just curious, you said "In the martial sciences" I'm curious as to what you mean by that.
Bode said:If you search for martial science I am sure some other post explains exactly what it means.
Well what do you know. Doesn't look like Infinite Insights does it Doctor?Kenpodoc said:On the initial topic "What does your Neutral Bow look like?" Go to Jaki McVicar's site and Look at the position of Mr Parkers feet in the photo section. http://www.mcvicarkenpoacademy.co.uk/
Jeff
Even Jeff Speakmens neutral bow doesn't look like the one from II. (Under the "what is kenpo" section).Doc said:Well what do you know. Doesn't look like Infinite Insights does it Doctor?
I wish he had allowed himself to be the model for more of the instructional pictures. I think that I understand his concerns, and I know that you can't strictly learn from pictures but they would have been a nice way to "index" the basics as he saw them. Well back to short 1 again.Doc said:Well what do you know. Doesn't look like Infinite Insights does it Doctor?
Yeah, he learned his lesson with the "Basics Booklet." Almost immediately a great deal of what he posed was changed, especially the blocks. A huge concern of his because people could always point to the book and say, "That's the way Ed Parker does it." He felt constrained by his own work. The only thing he ever posed for after that was his "Nunchaku Book." Other than that, he never instructionally posed again. He felt by having various students do it, he could always say, "It evolved."Kenpodoc said:I wish he had allowed himself to be the model for more of the instructional pictures. I think that I understand his concerns, and I know that you can't strictly learn from pictures but they would have been a nice way to "index" the basics as he saw them. Well back to short 1 again.
Jeff :asian:
Oh that was a good one. The stances in general as displayed in Infinite Insights are flawed and were not to Mr. Parker's liking. Drawings yes, pictures no.