Good marketing though.Crikey! I thought it was āofficialā until just now!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good marketing though.Crikey! I thought it was āofficialā until just now!
Well, there was no alternative, either. As a 12yr old Karate kid I did what I was told and paid with a Ā£3 postal order!Good marketing though.
As long as you had the insurance you'd have been fine though.Well, there was no alternative, either. As a 12yr old Karate kid I did what I was told and paid with a Ā£3 postal order!
If you are running a for profit school, then none of this matters at all. I have had quite the influx of new students recently and more than a few are coming to us from a specific different school in the area. The other school is demonstrably more successful than I am, they have over 300 students at all times, an army of about 100 black belts (this is purely a reflection of their belt color, not skill or experience since some of their black belts have less than a year experience), and a loyal cult following. The thing is, the head "master" doesn't seem to have any actual legitimate rank. He has switched organizations and traveled across the Midwest finding people who he could buy rank from until he managed to put 7 stripes on his belt and call himself master (my instructor was one he attempted this with about 15 years ago and failed miserably). All I had to do to get these students in was start marketing with my title of "master" instead of just Mister. Nobody has ever asked what that title means, what rank it applies to, who certified this rank/title, they just accept it because they don't know any better.How much experience or rank do you need in an art where it helps your resume instead of hurts it?
Iād follow a slightly different route. Rather than the years practised, Iād look for the governing association under which the dojo runs. Say it was Shotokan Karate and the governing body was the JKA or SKIF, then you know the grades and quality advertised are robust with a genuinely respected reputation. Iād be much less trustful of a Dan grade given solely from the āKoroddy Clan of Badiddly-Boing, Bowidahoā!If a friend asked me to help them find a school for them or their kid, Iād see the above and think.
ā5 year shodan? Sounds fairly legit. 1 yr of BJJ and blue belt? Open minded and looking to fill in their gaps in knowledge. Probably a pretty good place, if this is one of their instructors.ā
Not all schools operate under a larger associations, and to most people not already in the martial arts community association membership likely wonāt make any difference any way.Iād follow a slightly different route. Rather than the years practised, Iād look for the governing association under which the dojo runs. Say it was Shotokan Karate and the governing body was the JKA or SKIF, then you know the grades and quality advertised are robust with a genuinely respected reputation. Iād be much less trustful of a Dan grade given solely from the āKoroddy Clan of Badiddly-Boing, Bowidahoā!
And I'm suggesting these might be the 'danger zones'. "Hic sunt dracones"Not all schools operate under a larger associations, and to most people not already in the martial arts community association membership likely wonāt make any difference any way.
Why's that? What are your experiences?And personally the big major karate organizations I donāt hold in very high esteem.
Isn't this what the 'Interweb' is for? A newcomer to anything can, after a few hours exploration on the "compoo'uh", become very knowledgeable.Other styles like BJJ might benefit a bit more in general from the Gracie name, but the other orgs I donāt think are well known enough for a complete noob to have any recognition of.
Coming in late to the thread, so this may be addressed by others. But sticking to time is a little unreliable. Purple belt in BJJ means something, but 5 years of training doesn't really communicate the same thing. How often you train, how rigorously you train, what the level of competition you engaged in was, etc. All of that will affect how much you accomplished in your 5 years, ranging from very little to possibly quite a lot.Ignoring the derail...
Even if you consider just one art, the rank is not the best measurement. If one school is stricter than the other, a black belt could mean 5 years of training vs. 2 in the same karate style. And as you get to higher rank, it often has little to do with your proficiency. And some schools don't have ranks in a normally-understood format (as an example, my rank is lakan something in PTK..I don't even remember the full title if I don't look it up, and I doubt anyone I tell it to would have any reference point for it).
Hell, even in the same school I've seen much more proficient 'high ranking' (low-kyu) colored belts be more proficient than their 1st dan peers. So personally I put more stock in time training than I do in rank.
That said, to newcomers they're not going to know that, so they might be impressed with rank, and if you have a high-enough rank that can be stated as a X dan or a master, it's probably worth putting it in. My personal recommendation, from a marketing standpoint, is to either put the rank with number of years in parenthesis (ie: 3rd Dan TKD (10 years), Purple Belt BJJ (3 years), etc.), or do whichever one seems more impressive, but stay consistent.
So with your example, if BJJ was a focus of my school, if I was writing a bio it would be something like "I have 10 years training in Tae-Kwon-Do. I also trained for 5 years in it's korean grappling counter-part, Hapkido and have spent the last 3 years devoting myself to brazilian jiujitsu." This lets people see your training, gives you the option to expand on lesser-known arts rather than just a listing someone might not understand, and gives you the chance to specify what training is recent (I've seen people list 2nd dan in judo when they haven't done judo in 20 years, and no context that their main current art is their 2nd dan in karate).
My experience with big organizations is their schools are fast food franchises.And I'm suggesting these might be the 'danger zones'. "Hic sunt dracones"
Why's that? What are your experiences?
Isn't this what the 'Interweb' is for? A newcomer to anything can, after a few hours exploration on the "compoo'uh", become very knowledgeable.
It's an interesting analogy. As a consumer, the potential for GREAT food is higher at a local diner, but franchises have some real advantages, as well.My experience with big organizations is their schools are fast food franchises.
Iād rather a nice mom and pop diner. And in general donāt provide the sort of training Iād be comfortable recommending to someone who comes to me for advice.
Sure in an unaffiliated dojo thereās a chance for the head instructor to be a 15th Dan in 7 different martial arts, 6 of which are no touch chi BS. But thatās pretty rare overall.
This is why I like the current implementation that Kukkiwon has. They are among the biggest (if not THE biggest) Taekwondo organizations. They're the second worldwide organization, and the one currently approved of by South Korea.My experience with big organizations is their schools are fast food franchises.
Iād rather a nice mom and pop diner. And in general donāt provide the sort of training Iād be comfortable recommending to someone who comes to me for advice.
Sure in an unaffiliated dojo thereās a chance for the head instructor to be a 15th Dan in 7 different martial arts, 6 of which are no touch chi BS. But thatās pretty rare overall.
I would never recommend someone go to an ATA school for example. Iād recommend they just burn their money and watch YouTube before that.It's an interesting analogy. As a consumer, the potential for GREAT food is higher at a local diner, but franchises have some real advantages, as well.
Have you seen 'Ramsey's Kitchen Nightmares USA'?It's an interesting analogy. As a consumer, the potential for GREAT food is higher at a local diner, but franchises have some real advantages, as well.
No but Iāve seen bar rescue lol.Have you seen 'Ramsey's Kitchen Nightmares USA'?
Sure, but I'd say there is a meaningful difference between, say, McDonalds chains and Shake Shack. Same food, both chains, but the quality of one is consistently lower than the other.I would never recommend someone go to an ATA school for example. Iād recommend they just burn their money and watch YouTube before that.
Even with franchises the recipes might be the same, but the amount of care taken and over all quality of service will vary.
Iām sure we all have had franchise locations weāve avoided for years because of consistent bad service or improperly prepared food
My first job was at a McDonald's, and we kept that place immaculate. "Time to lean, time to clean." That was in the 1980s, though, so not sure if the culture of McD's has changed over the years.No but Iāve seen bar rescue lol.
If he went to a Burger King heād likely find a lot of the same things though based on what I remember of working at BK in high school.
Yeah, most big associations Iād only recommend if someone wants a martial arts themed baby sitter or martial arts themed cardio work out.Sure, but I'd say there is a meaningful difference between, say, McDonalds chains and Shake Shack. Same food, both chains, but the quality of one is consistently lower than the other.
I'd say the same in MA. I mean, Gracie Barra is as fast foody as a BJJ affiliation gets, but they have a good product that is going to work for most people.
Anyway, it's just an observation. The fast food analogy comes up every so often, and I thought I'd share my opinions.
Board breaking is very common in Eastern martial arts.Like some one posted a TKD org that requires board breakingā¦like why? At one point itās not really hard or difficult, but then you very quickly get to point of just being ridiculous. Looks good to outsiders though I guess.