I personally believe that wing chun -- whether the begining or end -- is only as interesting as the sifu\teacher make it, and in my opinion, many, many teachers make it far more complicated than it is.
After experimenting with the teaching of the SLT to one of my students in less than 2-lessons in 2-weeks, I have found that they can perform the form just as good as most people who's practiced for many years. Off course, they can't use all the tools contained within, but at least they have the tools to practice with.
Some practitioners have critercised and openly dissmissed my findings, saying that students can't have perfected the form in 2-weeks. This is true, but then my objectives isn't to teach my students so slow that I only progress them when they have perfected each stage of the form. I rather teach them the whole form quickly and let them 'play' with the form early on so at least they know about the tools, and then it's up to time and effort for them to perfect the form. A good analogy of my method would be to teaching a learner driver how to drive. No one would teach a learner driver how to change into 1st gear, and then only progress them further when they have perfected how to change into 1st gear. They would show them 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th gear, and then let them perfect changing between gears.
If you can understand the analogy above, then one can understand my teaching methods.
If anyone doubts my wing chun training methods, they are welcome to come and see my students, and compare forms.
Further more, in my experiences, the schools that hold their students back by showing the forms at an extremely slow pace, tend to stagnate their students eventual developments. Boredom sets in and they no longer want to learn something that was conceived to be simple and easy to begin with.