Warrant issued for mcgregors arrest

[Anarax]

I think Conor has a little bit of Stephen in him.

Stephen is way more coherent

 

[Headhunter]

Don't flatter me Bud. I'm sorry if you're offended that I find most of your comments funny. The icons are there for a reason. Unfortunately there is no "Rediculous" icon.

If there was you'd be getting them all the time

 

[Tames D]

If there was you'd be getting them all the time

 

[Tez3]

But, you've just supplied a laundry list of reasons there (might as well add in environmental psychological conditioning from childhood), all of which can be exasperated by, but none of which are dependent on an excess of testosterone.

You really don't read what I write do you, you look at a couple of words then make huge assumptions, again, about my posts. It seems as if you get fixated on one thing and cannot understand when the subject expands into a larger conversation. 'Ooo she said testosterone, it's only about that, can't discuss anything else, it's testosterone' please do consider things in a much wider context. Oh and stop seeing sexism everyone, it makes you look afraid of females.

 

[Headhunter]

Got to love master Ken

 

[pdg]

You really don't read what I write do you, you look at a couple of words then make huge assumptions, again, about my posts.

The post you made that I initially commented on was one single word.

As it was just that, taking into account the comment it was in reply to, there really is only one logical conclusion to make.

 

[Tez3]

The post you made that I initially commented on was one single word.

As it was just that, taking into account the comment it was in reply to, there really is only one logical conclusion to make.

With your agenda you will read into everything just what you want to see.

 

[Tez3]

pdg, thank you for proving me right, by clicking on 'funny' in retaliation it seems, you have shown that you not only have an agenda but are making it your business to give combative answers to my posts, I've noticed it elsewhere away from this thread as well. You seem determined to argue against me at every point by using arguments that don't apply, perhaps your anti feminist pov is getting in the way of constructive discussions here. This has come up before and again I decline to discuss by PM because I feel if you have problems with me they should be discussed in public, I don't like private correspondence in this respect, I like witnesses.

 

[pdg]

With your agenda you will read into everything just what you want to see.

 

[pdg]

pdg, thank you for proving me right, by clicking on 'funny' in retaliation it seems, you have shown that you not only have an agenda but are making it your business to give combative answers to my posts, I've noticed it elsewhere away from this thread as well. You seem determined to argue against me at every point by using arguments that don't apply, perhaps your anti feminist pov is getting in the way of constructive discussions here. This has come up before and again I decline to discuss by PM because I feel if you have problems with me they should be discussed in public, I don't like private correspondence in this respect, I like witnesses.

It wasn't a retaliatory rating, I genuinely found it funny that one who vehemently argues against assumptions makes such assumptions.

One thing I will definitely take issue with is this wording - "This has come up before and again I decline to discuss by PM".

I have sent you a total of one private message, in which I offered to discuss a topic in a thread that I stated I would take no further part in (mainly because it could be construed as political). In that I clearly stated it was entirely your decision to reply or not. You did not reply, and I left it.

So, you haven't expressly declined at all and insinuating that I'm sending you multiple private messages (or offers thereof) that you keep declining is nothing short of inflammatory.

 

[pdg]

For openness, I present the entire text of my one single private message for the perusal of any potential witness:

I said I was out of the discussion, so I'm not going to reply in the thread. I do give express permission for you to quote anything I say on the subject though, whether you're in agreement with any statement or not.

Without your permission, I'm not going to respond in private either though, so...

I'm more than prepared to have a chat/discussion/argument in 'private' if you want - entirely up to you, I won't be offended either way.

So I'll just leave this with you.

Paul

I did not receive any public or private response to this message, either to accept or decline.

 

[Tez3]

I genuinely found it funny that one who vehemently argues against assumptions makes such assumptions

If you think I'm arguing 'vehemently' then you haven't read my posts properly.

As for agenda, everyone has one. One of yours is clear, you have stated it and brought it up several up several times, it's anti feminism. it's not an assumption on my part but a reasonable belief based on your comments previously made on the subject.

Nothing says I have to answer PMs from strangers.

 

[pdg]

One of yours is clear, you have stated it and brought it up several up several times, it's anti feminism

Actually, it's not an agenda, it's more an opinion.

I don't like or agree with militant neo-feminism where women (or more accurately, anyone who states they don't identify as male) can essentially say or do anything they like to men and it's the man's responsibility to adjust themselves and their behaviour to accommodate that.

Maybe you'd prefer it if I accepted what I was told at an equal opportunities "workshop" - that I don't get to have an opinion on things like racism or sexism because (as a white male) they are things I am only capable of experiencing as an aggressor, never a victim. Basically that I cannot be discriminated against.

Nothing says I have to answer PMs from

Including me, I never said you were compelled to answer. You raised the point and (giving you the benefit of the doubt) badly worded it.

 

[Tez3]

don't like or agree with militant neo-feminism where women (or more accurately, anyone who states they don't identify as male) can essentially say or do anything they like to men and it's the man's responsibility to adjust themselves and their behaviour to accommodate that.

Exactly what has that got to do with anything said on here or to do with me? You keep bringing this up whenever you post something against what I've said. My user name is what it is because I don't actually wish to be identified as anything other than a martial artist, that you realised I am female is not down to me. I don't post nor have I, in all the years I've been on here, read posts from anyone that projected the view you are suggesting. I have never at anytime in my life suggested that women can say or do anything to men and the men have to live with it.

What kind of world are you in? One in which women are uppity, transsexuals aren't to be believed and white men are down trodden? Well, let me tell you mate, that's not my world and there's a good many people here you can tell you stories of being really prejudiced against for their race, religion and colour of their skin. As a 'white man' do you really think you know what being racially discriminated against is like? I'd like to hear your stories, I'm beginning to think they are coming from the now defunct Britain First movement. Stop whining.

When I campaign for female equality it's for child marriage to end, FGM to end, for girls to be educated. When I campaign for equality for men and women, it's for clean water, schools, the end of persecution, for decent homes, the end of using child soldiers, for free and secret elections, for freedom from hunger, poverty and disease. I campaign for the homeless and for those who suffer domestic abuse- men and women(Men's Advice Line – Help and support for male victims of domestic violence) I campaign for the government to keep the Military Covenant, I campaign for LBGT groups, I campaign for mental health groups, because I want a better life for everyone.

As a Jew I have been discriminated against, had abuse hurled at me, stones too at one time but I have had the privilege of serving in HM Forces as well as working alongside them when I was demobbed for over 40 years, I have not been discriminated against as a female. I earned equal pay while doing an equal job in my speciality and had huge fun doing it. I've worked with the most amazing men and women, I have trained too with some amazing people in martial arts.

You need some salt for the chips you have on your shoulders.

Maybe you'd prefer it if I accepted what I was told at an equal opportunities "workshop" - that I don't get to have an opinion on things like racism or sexism because (as a white male) they are things I am only capable of experiencing as an aggressor, never a victim. Basically that I cannot be discriminated against.

You are embarrassing yourself.

 

[Headhunter]

Sigh..got to love when a mma thread turns into a equality row.

Back to mma. Al iaquinta is now fighting khabib but he can't win the belt because he couldn't make weight and apparently Brock lesnar is getting a title shot (yeah seriously)

 

[Tez3]

Sigh..got to love when a mma thread turns into a equality row.

One of the weirder moments of my life I'll admit and I've had some very weird ones...most actually seem to be connected to MMA and one particular fighter. Paul Jenkins. If you think Conor is shocking, dear me, Paul was something else.

 

[Headhunter]

One of the weirder moments of my life I'll admit and I've had some very weird ones...most actually seem to be connected to MMA and one particular fighter. Paul Jenkins. If you think Conor is shocking, dear me, Paul was something else.

Is he the Welsh guy who's 41-47

 

[Tez3]

Is he the Welsh guy who's 41-47

That's the one, he's fought on our shows a few times, I even cornered him once, never again, it was the fight where he was wearing white shorts, farted and followed through. Lovely brown stain, his opponent, one of John Kavanagh's guys, was really not amused. One of Jenkin's favourite fight entrances was coming in wearing 'emu' legs looking like Rod Hull, another he wore a mankini, yet another he came out naked. His taste in porn is amazingly, disconcertingly and thoroughly disgusting, he would post pictures that burned your eyes out on CW forum on serious threads about fights etc, you never expected them so it was always a shock. He's as hard as nails though, does the doors and no one messes with him, even Ian Freeman doesn't mess with him.

 

[Tez3]

Special guest at a UK MMA show last night all the way from New York!

 

[TheArtofDave]

Special guest at a UK MMA show last night all the way from New York!

View attachment 21382

Keeping the discussion on Conor. The guy knew what he was doing. He had a gang of friends with him, and he got the security staff to let him and his crew in.

Khabib wasn't any better in that he said Brooklyn was known for being a gangster town and all Conor had to do was call him and they could fight. Another idiot. The UFC doesn't need that type of publicity.

It's like Conor forgot what martial arts is all about. Its definitely not about what he did. He did turn himself in though. That Mayweather money will be gone. But on the bright side you'll never see Floyd in the cage.

Also I hope Conor takes responsibility for this. This is not how a professional acts.