GBlues
Purple Belt
I've been busy, or I'd have responded here earlier.
I think what the original poster is discussing are two different types of violence. Rory Miller, in Meditations on Violence, uses the term "Monkey Dance" to describe one type of violent encounter, and I think it's a really good term. It's what the OP here seems to be describing as "social violence." A Monkey Dance is about showing status, rather than really doing harm. That doesn't mean you won't get hurt -- but it's not violence for the sake of violence, if that makes sense. Monkey Dances are typically preceded by a variety of behaviors and signals that it's coming. All of these are opportunities to back down and recognize the other person's status. A Monkey Dance requires at least two participants who both feel that they've got something to gain by playing. You ever see a big dog just look at some yappy thing that's barking and trying to intimidate the big dog, with a "yeah, right" attitude? Or seen someone trying to get someone to respond who just doesn't see that person as any threat at all? Who's going to get worked up at a 5 year old kid threatening to beat 'em up?
Real violent attacks are something different. The purpose isn't to simply tweak status -- it's to obtain a goal. That goal might be money, it might be rape, or it might be murder, but it's NOT about position. (Some gang violence is perpetrated against an innocent party to improve status within the gang -- but it's not a Monkey Dance, and won't be committed in the same way. The attack with be a violent attack.) It's going to be fast, surprising, forceful, and vicously powerful. There's not going to be much build up or warning; often, the first clue it's happening is when the fist hits or the knife goes in. The watchwords of certain tactical ops are Speed, Surprise, and Violence of Execution. They apply equally to attacks by criminals. This is the sort of thing that the OP here called "antisocial violence."
I think the terms social and antisocial violence aren't bad -- but they're confusing because of the conventional uses of the terms, and because of popular misunderstandings. But semantics don't help you deal with them.
The best preparation for a Monkey Dance is confidence. It takes two (or more) for that particular tango. If you're secure in your status, like that big dog, you won't have a problem. Or the idiot that tries to escalate the Monkey Dance will discover that you can more than handle him.
How do you prepare for the real violent attack? Awareness, prevention, and realism in your training. Transcend the rote repetition, and move to instinctive, unthinking response so that, when you are the victim of this sort of attack, you have tools available. It's not easy, it's very scary... but it can be done.
Hey thanks for posting this, that's what I was trying to get at. I'm sorry if I didn't explain it well enough, guys. I just tried to describe what I meant as best I could, his examples are much better than mine. Let's base the thread off of this guys post