WTF is wrong with some of you people???
the fact is that the kid is 17, thats still considered a minor.
the old dude is clearly presenting dialogue of a sexual manner to the, in the eyes of the law, child.
If this was my kid that guy would have a very different life atm.
are some of you so damn stuck on your stupid party line, and your stupid union biases that you think its ok for an adult to discuss any type of sexual context with a child of any age unsolicited, unwanted, and unnecessarily...
you disgust me.
Sorry, but I live in the real world, not political LaLa Land.
Don't give the poop about '17 being a child'
By law this child is allowed to join the armed forces and drive a car.
He may not vote, true, nor drink or smoke, but that is another story. (Kind of makes you wonder why a 'child' is at a political ralley....)
Anyhow I have seen 17 year old boys, and they are hardly angels. And the ones that get the vapors upon discussing above mentioned, those I'd be worried about. But that's not political, nor sexual.
First of all, where I stand on the political agenda has nothing to do with it..
Further more, you underestimate the exposure kids have, overestimate the purity of your kid. I know I consider my kid to be as pure as the new fallen snow, but sometimes he lets it show through that he readt stuff and talks about stuff with his peers. Certainly an 'aha' moment for mom, even though I do consider myself 'cool' and 'in the loop' A misconception I suppose all parents have to face. Heck, I still don't tell my parents everything....
I grant you that young adults most often don't have the tools to deal with certain breeches of boundaries from older people. That is part due to lack of personal experience and culture enforced control. But in most cases a 'WHOA, man, too much info' uttered by just about anybody should do it. Naturally more sarcastic retorts don't come easy (and take an amount of experience young people often don't have and I don't mean in the actual act of said practices, just general in how to deal with people)
Don't get me wrong. I know most words that are not in the dictionary, can be crude, rude and outright vulgar. I choose not to, for various reasons, but it makes for greater impact when I choose to turn the air blue.
It has nothing to do with party line. And frankly it is insulting to be lumped into a heap and basically labeled unpatriotic because you don't follow popular line. Frankly nobody in this country has a faintest idea what socialism is, or communism. And in some time it has deteriorated into the absurd: republican is what the white folks vote, democrats is for the black folks and those communists. and all those unpatriotic people. I have had many people - people I do consider dear friends - tell me that they vote straight up party line. Only on a local level they'd consider the guy 'from the other side' on personality.
Political line has become a farce. They put on a good show, rake in the money and go out for drinks later on, while 'the people' tear into each other over agenda that isn't.
One dirty old man told a young man about the meaning behind the insult of 'tea bagger' (which btw I had to look up, it never appeared on my radar before the Tea Party made the head lines) and it is turned into this communist conspiracy to corrupt our clean cut patriotic youth....it has nothing to do with party book (which I don't carry any) when you find that connection absurd. (and when the old man thought he could tell the young man something new....)
So what was it you find disgusting?