I teach a "I don't want to fight" stance, but it's nothing like that. Similar in that you keep your palms out, but that's about it.This is the one I'm referring to. This one is useless. Arms are in the fired position so she will need to bend her arms in order strike back. The idea position would allow her to punch with force. The other issue is that I can grab her finger from there and break them if I want. Simply grabbing her finger will cause her to pull her hand away in an effort to prevent me from breaking her finger. I just simply need to move forward when she pulls her hand back. The other problem is that I can easily strike her lower body or go under her arm for a shoot at the waist or her legs. looping and hooking punches will work too. The Tai Chi guy learn that the hard way. There are just better defensive postures to take. Men often tell women to take defensive postures that men don't take.
You should have your knees slightly bent, elbows almost pinned against your side and your arms up around a 60-70 degree angle. Not ideal because hour sacrificing mobility, but youe hands are still in enough of a guard position to defend.
Oh, and spending a lot of time jumping backwards or forwards from there so that if you can't block whatever comes you can move and set yourself up in a fighting stance.
Edit to add information: It's not a perfect fighting stance, but that's not the point of it. It's meant to
A. establish self defense to onlookers, and
B. prevent the attacker from being smart (let him telegraph) since you don't look like a threat.
it also happens to keep your hands close to shoulder level which I'm sure could help for grappling, but that's not my focus.
Last edited: