Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Candy back then is not the same as the candy that we have today. Candy back then had far less sugar than modern sugar, and was mostly made of natural sugars such as honey. Natural Sugar is more healthier for you than refined sugar. For example, you can eat honey and use honey to treat wounds. Even to this day I will use unfiltered honey on certain cuts and wounds to help speed up healing and to keep it from getting infected. The same can not be done with refined sugar. Honey (unfiltered honey) also doesn't come with the same health risks as sugar and it also doesn't give you the energy crash that refined Sugar does. The reason I mention unfiltered honey because even today's honey is refined to make it sweeter. There is a huge difference between the two.The article doesn't say sugar was uncommon in the diet before the 1600s, it says almost two thousand years prior, sugar (and of course candy) was already a Silk Road mainstay. Sugar candies were common in China a long time ago.
You would have to eat enormous amounts of a natural food to get the same negative effects from refined sugar. Eating an apple is not the same sugar as refined sugar. This is way dietitians tell you to eat a lot of fruit but they don't say eat a lot of refined sugar.Refined sugar is not the only unhealthy sugar. All sugars can be damaging when consumed in unhealthy quantities or at the wrong times, such as before or after training.
The fact that your example requires that I ONLY EAT WATERMELON OR COTTON CANDY GRAPES. Proves my point of just how much you would have to eat in order to create the negative effects of refined sugar. Because of the high water content of these foods, you'll most likely have diarrhea before you even get to "ONLY EAT WATERMELON"If you don't believe that, try eating nothing but watermelon or cotton candy grapes. It's healthier, but not by much.
The only thing I question is a diet specifically for Stances.So I'm just intensely curious, one Jow Ga student to another, how it came to be that you questioned their existence.
My research showed that.I hold to my point: sugar was rare until historically recently, and kung fu masters of thousands of years ago, would not have had a high sugar diet to recognize its detrimental effects.
You did say that they knew about the bad effects of a high sugar diet thousands of years ago, not centuries ago. You did say centuries later in that same sentence. I’ve posted and bolded and underlined the appropriate portion.
The article that you posted to stated that throughout the Middle Ages sugar was a rare and expensive spice, and not a mainstay in the diet.
I just realized you stated the same thing again in this recent post. Once again I’ve bolded and underlined the relevant portion. You state that kung fu masters knew this thousands of years ago.
You would have to eat enormous amounts of a natural food to get the same negative effects from refined sugar.
The only thing I question is a diet specifically for Stances.
Athletes and Soilders have always had a dietary requirements that's different from the average person. There's nothing new about that. But there's no "jump higher diet" or "punch harder diet".
Ok, I can accept that, now that you have taken the opportunity to clarify your message. I can agree that your statement was unclear as to your message. Now that I understand your intended message, I will say that I am doubtful. Once again, I do not buy the notion that there was so much sugar, refined or otherwise, in anybody’s diet thousands of years ago, to be able to specifically evaluate its negative effects. Understanding that you are saying that the kung fu masters of centuries ago were looking at records from thousands of years ago.No, you are just misreading what I typed, a second time.
If you need me to hold your hand, just ask, but I clearly said that hundreds of years ago, kung fu masters knew of thousand year old dietary concerns, especially when it comes to stancework in kung fu.
A lot of this material is part and parcel of Chinese kung fu medicine, at a basic level no less.
There may be people who hold the belief that the specific diet of the people who developed a physical skillset is the proper diet for anyone who wishes to practice that skillset. I find that position to be unsupportable.There is a specific diet, in southern China, for southern Chinese kung fu training and most especially stancework. It involves avoiding a lot of sugars and other inflammatory things.
Here I am talking about stance health and you're all jump and punch!
Yum.Last night's training diet -
View attachment 23018
Northern Italian Peasant Shrimp and pasta for punching...
View attachment 23019
And Eggplant Parm....just for kicks.
Do the math.According to whom? Blood sugar is blood sugar, Jow Ga.
I just did the watermelon math. So I guess I have science behind me in terms of watermelon.I can't wait until we get past the proper nutrition for Jow Ga Kuen stancework.
I have Jow Lung's entire story and even people like Ron Wheeler behind me.
The thing that we are trying to get you to understand is that people in the past were getting far less sugar than they are now and it wasn't by choice. It was because of scarcity and the fact that Sugar was expensive. Refined sugar doesn't have the same effects on the body as natural sugar. Natural sugar absorbs into the body and blood more slowly. Refined sugar is like concentrated sugar so you are getting more sugar per teaspoon than you would with natural sugar. Refined sugar also goes directly into the blood stream and causes trouble. These are things that you cannot possible understand unless you had to be ability to measure blood sugar. Testing of blood sugar didn't occur until mid 1800's and it was done by doctors. The first commercialized blood sugar test was in 1908. So doctors weren't able to test blood sugar levels before 1900. Blood glucose testing didn't come until 1970There is a specific diet, in southern China, for southern Chinese kung fu training and most especially stancework. It involves avoiding a lot of sugars and other inflammatory things.
We shall see what comes of this request. I research the dietary data of what was eaten around that time and when it came to refined sugar, It was always the same for every culture around the globe. Refined sugar was expensive and only the wealthy could afford it and it wasn't until refined sugar was industrialized that it became more affordable. I have yet to see anything other than this. From historians, to dieticians , to nutritionists, and to doctors.But if you can point to some academic articles in archaeology or nutritional history, or authenticated documents from Chinese history for example, I would be interested in taking a look.
This is actually recorded in history. It wasn't based on joint pain. It was based on creating the best athlete and best soldier. They would know of foods that increase energy as well as foods that would make a person sluggish. I'll use myself as an example, before I got into nutrition.There are many diets from every culture around the globe that are high quality diets and are appropriate for physical and athletic endeavors of any kind.
There may be people who hold the belief that the specific diet of the people who developed a physical skillset is the proper diet for anyone who wishes to practice that skillset. I find that position to be unsupportable.
There are many diets from every culture around the globe that are high quality diets and are appropriate for physical and athletic endeavors of any kind. These diets typically include lots of vegetables, fruits, limited meat especially red meat, limited carbs and sweets/refined sugars. And we can acknowledge that there are lots of low quality food items including highly processed foods, candy, etc., things that ought to be avoided in the diet. None of that is a mystery.
I don’t need to eat a specific Chinese or Cantonese diet to maximize my kung fu training.
Do the math.
Every 100 grams (half a cup. With a cup being single serving size) of watermelon contains approximately 7 grams of sugar. or 1.68 teaspoons of sugar
If I eat same weight 100 grams of refined sugar then I would be consuming 24 teaspoons of sugar
In order for me to get the same amount of sugar as 100 grams of refined sugar, I would have to eat 1290 grams of watermelon. Which is significantly larger than 100 grams of sugar. Lets say I double my helping of water melon and eat 200 grams. Which means I'm eating 3.36 teaspoons of natural sugar. Now let me double the refined sugar to 200 grams which means that I would then be consuming 48 teaspoons of refined sugar.
Lets say I'm just freaking greedy and eat 4 cups of watermelon. Which puts me at 800 grams of natural sugar (13.44 teaspoons of natural sugar). Now lets look at 800 grams of refined sugar which is the same as consuming (192 teaspoons of refine sugar)