Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No one deserves to be gunned down like that but the guy that got shot made some major mistakes. He should have just kept walking after he got bumped into. Instead, he turned around and forced a confrontation. From that point there was little, if anything, he could have done to save himself.
The video does accurately highlight the ultra-violent response to attacks on their pride which is common to many criminal street gang members. We have a bump, leading to words, spitting, striking, and finally murder. About the only self defense relevance is that, first, the guy with the gun tends to win the confrontation; second, it's probably a good idea to weigh the perceived insult against your death; and finally, that it's important to recognize gang members, especially when they're in groups.If he hit him again and enterd him, there is a lot he could have done. hitting the guy and then standing there as the guy pulled his gun was dumb.
Oh well 1 idiot dead, another in Prison.
Their's is a subcoulture that should be eliminated, many of the outlaws of the old west were eliminated because decent people would not put up with it and would gun such animals down, not worrying about their rights or poor upbringing.
We and other places have MS-13 runnig around, a known violent gang, that operates outside the US as well.
They should be considerd a terrorist Org and like them targeted by Spec Ops and Intel assets for elimination. Cops should be allowed to shot on site any idiot wearing the MS-13 uniform (They wear 13s on them and other tells) by their open flaunting of it, they are admitting they are part of a violent group and there is no need of a trial.
I know it wont happen, yet.
Yes, just the way to handle this imho too.This goes to show the importance of thinking before you act IMO. A simple "Oopps, sorry man. Didn't mean to walk into you."may have prevented this....
In the gang culture which I think these guys represent (have worked with them almost 20 years), once the 'victim' turned around and fronted the other guy, 'talking your way' out was probably a lost option. So, yeah, a quick apology and keep moving, then nothing gets made of it. The shooter didn't look to me as if he was looking for trouble--I didn't see any hard shoulder check, or body put into the arms as they bumped each other. So why start something that can get you dead?you never know who is carrying a weapon and who isnt. Even in this case, where is seems the shooter was the one who initiated this, talking your way out would probably have been a better choice.
This did escape me (had the sound off/preoccupied in the beginning), so thanks for the tip, and I agree that 18th St. are as hardcore as it gets.(By the way; did it escape your notice that the killer in this case was a member of 18th Street/Mara 18, NOT Mara Salvatrucha? And 18th Street is every bit as violent as MS... As are the Gangster Disciples, SSL, Sur13, and lots more...)
Not a rant to me. I appreciate learning all I can about gangs, especially from those with personal experience.Forgive the rant -- but fighting gangs requires a multi-faceted approach that begins with knowing what you're talking about.
Yes, just the way to handle this imho too.
I can't read the tats, but these guys may have been in rival factions and would have immediately recognized each others' ink, thus immediately escalating anything beyond MJS' solution--'Oops, my bad,' keep walking. At any rate, as someone said, it just seems to me there may be some history here we don't know about.
In the gang culture which I think these guys represent (have worked with them almost 20 years), once the 'victim' turned around and fronted the other guy, 'talking your way' out was probably a lost option. So, yeah, a quick apology and keep moving, then nothing gets made of it. The shooter didn't look to me as if he was looking for trouble--I didn't see any hard shoulder check, or body put into the arms as they bumped each other. So why start something that can get you dead?
A good wake up call, Mike. Thanks for sharing it. :asian:
Both points well taken. Avoidance, if possible. But if confronted and he reaches to go inside his clothing--the opposite direction of swinging at you--probably safe to assume he's reaching for something.My main point of posting this, wasn't necessarily to focus on gangs, but to show that this could happen to anyone.
At the least, if faced with someone who makes a sudden move, ie: reaching into a pocket, behind their back, towards the front of their pants, lifting their shirt, I'd think attempting some sort of check and counter strike would be a wise move. Why wait for them to pull the weapon?
I meant to give the impression that this is exactly my position, also. As Mike reiterated above, sometimes talking just isn't an option.grydth said:But - if one must use violence, finish it... quickly, decisively... and only if necessary, terminally.
It sure seemed that, after throwing the punch, Guy A just stood there and watched Guy B reach into his pants, pull out a firearm, aim the weapon, cock the weapon, and fire the weapon.
During that time, he seemed to not take any action. One begins to wonder what was going through his mind as he watched this unfold before his eyes. Certainly, it must have been some sort of 'He's not going to use that gun' train of thought.