I find it difficult to agree with anything Still Learning says. But he has a point. When he talks disparagingly about forms and katas almost everyone says "You do jab, cross, hook, uppercut. Isn't that a form? Isn't that the same as a kata?" If you want to be that broad, then "One foot in front of the other" is The Walking Kata. But it's still disingenuous. Because then they say "Any patterned movement is a kata. That patterned movement is good. So whatever patterned movement we do is good." The more honest ones will admit that there's a real difference between a short combination and a whole hyung. But most of them won't.
So yes, he has a point. What he does is qualitatively different. It's not accurate or honest to conflate that and, say the 108 kuen of Wah Lum Praying Mantis.
I wouldn't say walking is on the same lines as when I spoke of boxing combos. The issue here, is that SL is completely disregarding the use of kata..plain and simple! In your analogy of walking...well, there is only one way of walking, compared to multiple ways of throwing boxing combos. Sure, when doing a kata, you do it move by move, from start to finish, but applications can come from anywhere in that kata. When you walk, you dont take a few steps facing forward, then turn sideways, crossing one foot over the next, then turn around and walk backwards, etc.
I think Exile summed it up pretty good with his analogy. Additionally, I have said the same thing...that while in a confrontation, one isn't going to take up a pose and perform move by move, a kata to defend themselves, but instead, just like SD techniques, you're going to extract what you need at the time.
The main issue, as its been said countless times, is not that kata are bad, but instead, the person or people teaching them, don't have a clue what they're doing. How can someone teach someone else if they themselves, don't have a full grasp? Its like giving someone a car, minus the tires.