oftheherd1
Senior Master
- Joined
- May 12, 2011
- Messages
- 4,685
- Reaction score
- 817
Yes and no. I'm ashamed of it, but I'm pretty self aware.
IMHO that's a big leap that most people don't make. Good for you.
...
Fortunately, because I dealt with it the hard way over a period of decades, my son benefited when I saw the same behavior in him.
Lucky for your son. And again, good on you. Most of us don't like to admit to ourselves when we do wrong, much less to someone else. That takes a big mind. I work on it but am unsuccessful more often than not.
I would actually appreciate more education in this area. If we're talking about kids, I just don't see it being assault. There are points where it progresses to assault. Are there any LEO or lawyers who are familiar with juvenile law?
No doubt someone else will jump in and correct me if I am wrong. But I don't think the law makes a distinction between adults and juveniles as regards the elements of most crimes. They may choose to handle some procedures and punishment differently, but usually a crime is a crime, regardless of the age of an offender.
I wonder if you are disinclined to consider bullying less than a crime because of you own experiences? And if you therefore have separated bullying as a type of act, from the manifestation of the act of bullying, which in fact manifests itself as criminal behavior. Even the act you described above would be a crime in some jurisdictions. In the UCMJ (military law), it was called Provoking Speeches and Gestures ( http://usmilitary.about.com/od/punitivearticles/a/mcm117.htm ). Granted it was a thing seldom used, but it was there and available for punishment of that type of conduct. If you read the link, it was there to try and prevent a breach of the peace, something which you in fact accomplished.
Nonetheless, I think it is something worthy of discussion. Should we give kids a pass on the law when they bully? Could we use that in any way as a tool to prevent bullying?