TigerWoman said:
implementation. =carry out, accomplish, to give practical effect to
Yes, I know what implimentation means. However, you can do all of what ToD described while kicking air. You produce an attack that's sound technichally, but that's not something that carries over to proper application automatically. Therefore, timing is not a part of the equation ToD posting IMO.
TOD didn't say a "combination" of speed and power-?? misquoted. He also doesn't say it is a physical attribute.
Nor did I say it was entirely mental. I said it was more mental than physical. There's a difference there.
Ok, I can see what you are thinking now. You think timing is where one has to "perceive, see and act" and yes I agree with you on that.
I think timing is where one has to plan, anticipate and act accordingly from there. Reactionary fighting means that you've given up initiative, which means you've given the opponent the advantage.
Its the whole ball of wax. You have to know what's going on to act. But timing is also getting your "reaction kick" in there at the right moment.
Yes, but that's not a matter of speed. That's a matter of knowing when your kick needs to be where it's going. You can't do that on reaction. You can via anticipation. You don't even need to be especially zippy.
So if implementation means to carry out, give practical effect to, some thinking has to be done in advance, perception, for anything to be implemented. But for it to be fast, there also has to be speed and power.
For it to be fast, it simply has to be fast. For it to be strong, it has to have speed and power. For it to connect and become effective, it needs timing.
So timing is perception AND the implementation of speed and power. He just left out a word that was understood to be there. Like... (you) Go get that ball.
No. That's not what was said at all. "Mass times velocity equals power; therfore, timing is not better than speed and power, it is an implimentation of speed and power, or dare I say part of speed and power."
Only problem with that is that timing's not an aspect of speed or power. Timing makes speed and power relevant. Don't need timing in the least to break a board for example.
Proper timing can make superior speed and power irrelevant. One is not automatically bourne from the other.
So, yeah, I still think you said the same thing. But thanks, now I think I understand you better. Hopefully ... peace? :asian:
I'm just disagreeing with you. There's also a difference between that and needing to sue for peace.
