I've just read through all the posts in this thread. There is so much I wanted to commented on along the way, but cannot remember it all. I wish I had taken notes. (There's no way I'm going to read from the top again . . .)
Let me start out by saying that when I started doing Taekwon-Do we did it the old style with no "new" sine wave motion. There was a "natural" wave, but power generation for us came almost exclusively from hip rotation. In the meantime I've come to accept the sine wave motion and even -- dare I admit it on this somewhat anti-sine wave movement thread? -- appreciate its contribution.
Yes it is true that Gen. Choi gave it to the North Koreans as "a gift" and that there may have been some political motive behind it, but I think it is here where I disagree with some on this thread. I don't think he suddenly made up some arbitrary motion just so he could distinguish the North Koreans from the rest. I think that even if he wasn't involved with North Korea at all, that he would still have steered Taekwon-Do in this direction.
The reason I'm saying so is because there had always been a slow evolution away from Japanese Karate towards something more unique, more Korean.
The section quoted from the book
A Killing Art actually makes it clear that the sine wave motion created: "a slower, more rhythmic, bobbing-on-the-sea look
that dramatically distinguished it from Karate and Kim Un-yong's Tae Kwon Do."
While this "bobbing-on-the-see look" seem to have appeared out of nowhere, I strongly believe that it did in fact have a very specific origin: Taekkyeon (also Romanized as Taekkyun). I made this point on
another thread, but since nobody has touched on the Taekkyeon connection on this thread, I guess I can repeat it here.
In its original form Taekwon-Do was not much different from karate. Although Taekwon-Do has changed quite a bit since then, most people still try to understand Taekwon-Do from that old paradigm and within this "karatesque" paradigm this "bobbing" motion just doesn't make sense at all. In fact, much effort is put into karate training
not to raise-or-lower your head during your motions. That paradigm is innately flawed because it negates the other chief influence into Taekwon-Do -- even if you do not consider Taekkyeon's influence a strong one, it is an influence that ought to be considered.O
Once you've practised in Taekkyeon (like I have) and you are then confronted with ITF Taekwon-Do and it's strange sine wave motion, you would not think it that peculiar at all. A type of "bobbing" motion in Taekkyeon is part of their most basic footwork, called
pumbalbgi 품밟기. I believe that were you trained in Taekkyeon and took up karate you would find it excruciatingly difficult to adopt karate's
bobbingless motions while the transition from Taekkyeon to ITF Taekwon-Do with its sine wave motion would be much easier. (Of course this is merely my guess, as I don't actually know anybody that has made such a conversion from Taekkyeon to ITF Taekwon-Do. I am inferring it more on a type of reversed logic based on my personal experience of having taken up Taekkyeon after having already done ITF Taekwon-Do for many years. I am quite sure that were I to have taken up Taekkyeon before I was familiar with the sine wave motion during the time my movements looked more like karate, I would have struggled much more learning to move "properly" in Taekkyeon.)
Simply put, if your martial art experience have always been karate style motions (including old style Taekwon-Do), the sine wave motion looks and feels quite foreign. However, if you had a martial art background where the motions are less linear, like in Taekkyeon or
Aikido, the sine wave motion would not seem so strange to you. Furthermore, your understanding of the sine wave motion will also most likely not be so simplistic as "down-up-down". You may very well recognise it as one manifestation of other common (soft style) martial art principles like the circle principle or the yin-yang principle.
Although Gen. Choi did have the (Shotokan) karate paradigm, he also had a Taekkyeon paradigm from his youth. The "bobbing" was not an arbitrary addition to Taekwon-Do, but was actually the inclusion of a principle from Taekkyeon, which in effect changed Taekwon-Do so that it became more Korean and less Japanese, more Taekkyeon and less Karate.
Well, those are my thoughts . . .
Regards,
S