dancingalone
Grandmaster
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2007
- Messages
- 5,322
- Reaction score
- 281
Aren't they?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aren't they?
Biomechanics, smiomechanics. Some Martial Artists can punch a hole in you with a reverse punch. Some of them work the makiwara, some do not. If you get hit by a nasty one, or God forbid, you run into it, the rest of your day (or week) is really going to s*ck. It's even going to hurt while you're driving home. And good luck sleeping in that recliner. The guys I know who have the best ones say it comes from their center, their Hara. It's not what they hit, it's what they emit.
Muay Thai Practitioners Kick Trees;
Kyokushin Karateka Punch Trees or Rocks;
Personally, I havent ever used one. Though I dont quite see how such a question came out of discussing the reasons why one would use a Makiwara, when I was mostly saying that since what Youre primarily gaining is proper technique, You dont NEED a Makiwara.
I have duly noted that KKW taekwondoin can be noted for their evasive and attacking footwork. But while this is obviously a strong asset, it's not necessarily a trump card. A mediocre TKD player, even one trained in modern methods, will get his lunch taken placed in other situations versus ELITE martial artists training in other things.
Agreed, because there has to be a certain amount of give or else the force will transfer back to the puncher.And they tend to end up with health issues later in life.
And some "Old School" Organisations never used Makiwara throughout the course of Their Organisations existence.Some old school practitioners would disagree with that. To some, without makiwara training, there is no karate.
Some of them are quite old, and look just fine.And they tend to end up with health issues later in life.
And some "Old School" Organisations never used Makiwara throughout the course of Their Organisations existence.
Im sure plenty of Karate Systems would hold that opinion, and possibly other Systems.
If You constrewed what I said as saying that Karate Organisations wouldnt use Makiwara, that was not the intention, since We were discussing TKD in the TKD Forum in a Thread about TKD. I would presume.Which karate organizations would that be?
If You constrewed what I said as saying that Karate Organisations wouldnt use Makiwara, that was not the intention, since We were discussing TKD in the TKD Forum in a Thread about TKD. I would presume.
And some "Old School" Organisations never used Makiwara throughout the course of Their Organisations existence.
Im sure plenty of Karate Systems would hold that opinion, and possibly other Systems.
And they tend to end up with health issues later in life.
Here is what you wrote:
If you are referring to Taekwondo organizations in your first sentence, which ones?
In your second sentence, you are referring to Karate systems, hence my question. Which karate organizations would that be?
Some old school practitioners would disagree with that. To some, without makiwara training, there is no karate.
To the first, every single one I have ever seen in My entire life. And thats quite a few.
To the second, that was Karate Organisations holding the opinion that Makiwara are essential, which I said to agree with;
The purpose for using two statements, is because I was unsure if Puunui was trying to use that as a reference to Karate, and not Taekwondo, or using a reference about Karate and relating it to Taekwondo, so I addressed both possibilities as best I could.
Taking what I said, and not putting it in relation to what I was saying it to, makes it sound like I was saying that Karate Organisations surely hold the same opinion as the above. In context with who and what I was saying it to, not so much, Good Sir.
And some "Old School" Organisations never used Makiwara throughout the course of Their Organisations existence.
Im sure plenty of Karate Systems would hold that opinion, and possibly other Systems.
OK, here is the original:
Originally Posted by puunui
Some old school practitioners would disagree with that. To some, without makiwara training, there is no karate.
I get it, you say that plenty of Karate Systems would hold that opinion, the opinion that without makiwara training, there is not karate.
Now my question: What "old school" Taekwondo Organizations never used makiwara throughout the course of their organizations existence? (I assume you are referring to Taekwondo here since in your previous response you stated to me this was a Taekwondo thread, in the Taekwondo section, etc)
Yes.
To begin with, the one Im training in.
Secondly, as far as Im aware from every Dojang Ive been to, the ITF. I didnt even know what a Makiwara was before joining the forum.
For that matter, of the KKW Dojang Ive seen, I havent seen any Makiwara. That isnt to say they dont use them, that is to say, I havent seen them.
From some time spent looking around the Internet, it seems that its mostly the Instructors who advocate Their usage, rather than the Organisations. I can find plenty of references to Organisations other than the above which do actively seem to use them.
Listed are, Song Moo Kwan, and Joong Do Kwan. Since apparently We need to be very specific.
Correct Me if Im wrong, but Im getting a vibe that Youre trying to create a logical collapse, in an effort to have Me draw some kind of conclusion from all this.
Also, I did answer Your Question above before, just in case You missed it.
"To the first, every single one I have ever seen in My entire life. And thats quite a few."
Now, I presume that by Old School, We mean among the founders of the System, since We can only really go back to the 50s? In which case, Ive already answered that. With the exception of an Instructors Preference, the ITF. For that matter, the GTF also (Albeit they werent founded back in the 50s/60s. Its just a fairly big organisation, which doesnt seem to use them).
The development of the reverse punch in the “Old School” days of the Kwan was centered around training on the “talyunbong”, or, in ground makiwara, for all schools. Today this practice has mostly disappeared in favor of the use of more modern training equipment and methods.
All the “Old School” Taekwondo Organizations used the talyunbong (in-ground makiwara). These started in the 1940's They are:
Chung Do Kwan
Jidokwan
Chang Moo Kwan
Moo Duk Kwan
Song Moo Kwan
Their spin off schools also used the talyunbong. These started in the 1950's They are:
Oh Do Kwan (also root of ITF)
Han Moo Kwan
Kang Duk Won
Jung Do Kwan
These 9 schools are as “Old School” as one can get in Taekwondo.
Every single Taekwondo practitioner and every single Taekwondo organization can trace their lineage back to one of these 9 Kwan.
I cant say Im surprised by that; However, I do recall reading one possible exception in My adventures with Google.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chong_Chul_Rhee
I see very early affiliation with the KTA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korea_Taekwondo_Association
And the early ITF later. However, thats the only affiliations Im seeing listed anywere.
I also know for a fact, that as long as Theyve gone by their current name (1965ish), They have never used Makiwara. Or Talyunbong. Or any Striking Posts.