punisher73
Senior Master
While I too subscribe to the "Boards don't hit back" theory, I have to disagree that it's the same as heavy bag or focus mitt training. The objective of board breaking is as the term says ... to break a board. To the contrary, the objective is not to punch a hole through a heavy bag. There's no false sense of victory seeing the sand or foam from a heavy bag spill onto the floor. But--and this is just one guy's opinion--there is a false sense of victory in breaking boards, especially boards that break on-demand. That's perfectly fine for children. But I'm not so sure that anyone over the age of 13 ought to rely on board breaking in their training.
Again, no offense. Just one guy's opinion.
No offense taken. I agree with much of what you have said. You qualified "why" you don't rely on board breaking and had a sound argument. You didn't just say "boards don't hit back" and stop it at that to dismiss it. You showed the limits of the training (which I agree with).
Reading previous posts, you will see that I am against children punching boards anyways since their hands are not fully formed. I also agree that it is an improper use of the board breaking if they are baked or made to break easy for show. That again defeats the purpose. Board breaking, is a tool that can be used and has a time or place in it. We wouldn't tell someone because they can dance around a heavy bag that they can beat anybody. The heavy bag has a specific purpose and as long as that is defined and stuck to, it is a good training aid. Just like board breaking CAN be, but again it is usually exagerated to what it's purpose is.