Henderson, I think the point AceHBK was making was that the first few UFC's were wide open to pretty much any style, so the styles claiming street effectiveness should have been able to demonstrate how finger locks etc were superior in a largely unrestricted format.
IMO the claim's a tad pie in the sky since the Gracies were picking the fighters, and in UFC 1's case rigging the cards for good measure. The UFC was designed to showcase BJJ, and prove that it was the ultimate MA. It wasn't supposed to prove the greatness of crosstraining or kickstart the evolution of MMA to what's developed now.
That aside, it's sad that Royce won't even give Sakuraba his due. "He's not a better fighter. He just beat me and every one we sent against him. Doesn't mean he's better."
IMO the claim's a tad pie in the sky since the Gracies were picking the fighters, and in UFC 1's case rigging the cards for good measure. The UFC was designed to showcase BJJ, and prove that it was the ultimate MA. It wasn't supposed to prove the greatness of crosstraining or kickstart the evolution of MMA to what's developed now.
That aside, it's sad that Royce won't even give Sakuraba his due. "He's not a better fighter. He just beat me and every one we sent against him. Doesn't mean he's better."