I think it can be argued that one of the most important aspects of self-defense is detecting potentially dangerous situations and dealing with them appropriately BEFORE they become self-defense situations.
This requires two capabilities. The first is detection; the second is appropriate action.
I found this article of interest because it deals with detection. The type of danger in this case is roadside bombs in a war zone - something many of us will never have to deal with. However, I think some of the points made are interesting and might have applicability to a discussion about detecting dangerous situations in general.
http://www.cleveland.com/world/index.ssf/2009/10/marines_best_at_spotting_roads.html
Marines best at spotting roadside bombs either grew up rural and hunted, or urban in gang turf
By The Los Angeles Times
October 28, 2009, 7:54PM
This requires two capabilities. The first is detection; the second is appropriate action.
I found this article of interest because it deals with detection. The type of danger in this case is roadside bombs in a war zone - something many of us will never have to deal with. However, I think some of the points made are interesting and might have applicability to a discussion about detecting dangerous situations in general.
http://www.cleveland.com/world/index.ssf/2009/10/marines_best_at_spotting_roads.html
Marines best at spotting roadside bombs either grew up rural and hunted, or urban in gang turf
By The Los Angeles Times
October 28, 2009, 7:54PM
Military researchers have found that two groups of personnel were particularly good at spotting anomalies: those with hunting backgrounds, who traipsed the woods as youth in search of a deer or turkey; and those who grew up in urban circumstances where it is often important to know which gang controls which block.
Personnel who fit neither category, often young men who grew up in the suburbs and developed a fondness for video games, did not seem to have the depth perception and peripheral vision of the others.