I hear a lot of people(older people) say that pride was a better promotion than UFC. I also saw a lot of exciting pride fights. What makes people say that Pride was better than the UFC? Or is it just because Pride was for their generation and UFC is for the younger ones?
It was mainly to do with the fighters and the ruleset. In its heyday, Pride had Shogun Rua, Wanderlei Silva, Cro Cop, and a whole lot of fighters who were beasts. What people didn't appreciate at the time is how much of the dominance was due to steroids.
The rules were a little different. No elbows to a downed opponent, not because it was dangerous. Rather, it was because the elbows aren't dangerous but can cause a fight ending cut. It's cheesy. I still agree with that. The only point of elbows is to cut your opponent and cause a fight stoppage.
Pride did, however, allow stomping kicks, knees and soccer kicks to a downed opponent. Diving in for a single leg wouldn't save you from a fight ending knee to the top of the head in Pride. Another difference is that the first round was 10 minutes long and the second 5 minutes. The long first round added a different element to the fights.
The different ruleset made for some exciting fights. One other difference is that Japan loves spectacle. This includes novelty fights. So, you'd have two giants in the ring, or one sumo guy vs a judo guy. Stuff like that.