Dad of lady Taz!
White Belt
- Joined
- May 6, 2010
- Messages
- 18
- Reaction score
- 1
During my brief stint in the sport, I have noticed that quite a few athletes have a parent/coach. The success rate doesn't seem to skew one way or the other, as opposed to having an instructor coach. Yet, I do hear quite a few negative comments from instructors/masters who don't like to see parents coach. You can look at the cases of two rising female tae kwon do athletes Cheyenne Lewis "parent coach" vs Derianne Morales "instructor coach" both have had success in the last year, each with their own approach. To me the typical arguments cancel themselves out. Too close to the athlete, too detached from the athlete, too emotionally involved, not emotionally involved enough...are points that you can argue ad infinitum.
My question is other than some of the above typical arguments, why would an instructor/master have a problem with a parent/coach. Now, I'm not talking about training, that's altogether different. Everyone has their own philosophy when it comes to the actual training and how they work between home and the studio. What I'm talking about is on game day the parent sitting in and giving instruction.
Ok, the can of worms is now open!
My question is other than some of the above typical arguments, why would an instructor/master have a problem with a parent/coach. Now, I'm not talking about training, that's altogether different. Everyone has their own philosophy when it comes to the actual training and how they work between home and the studio. What I'm talking about is on game day the parent sitting in and giving instruction.
Ok, the can of worms is now open!