OK those are fair enough points. I accept that. Mind you the style sort of came together, I won't be so bold as to state that I formed a system. I am just not that experienced, I am still very much learning. I did form the school format and organized the "system" so to speak. I do believe I am set apart in the indie sense, the term Ninjustu to me I am attached to in spirit and train that way. As well as I can.
Now the other thread was locked but I will answer here. It really doesn't matter what I think of these schools. Really. It's just my opinion, very little I defend until I have met with them. Or seen them. There are some indie schools that personally disgust me, some depress me. I won't slam them but I won't defend them. I have never trained in Saito. I know Steve from my board,, there he is always polite and intelligent. Ken I do not know. Now yes he was getting very colourful and irrational at times, but combating you in a war of words can get a bit hot for the defence. I speak from experience.
In all honesty, I have seen as much corruption, misrepresentation, crap skill, back-stabbing etc etc in the Bujinkan. Much of the time I think the warrior training hall needs to clean it's own act up before attacking others. but that is my personal experience. I have trained in many Kan dojo, and 1 or 2 Genbukan.
It always blew me away and the lack of consistancy in the dojo, format difference, politics and the amout they all hated each other.
When I went to the Tai kai I saw Shihan on stage, that personally moved like orange belts. I am no expert but it was embarrassing.
So all the problems that occur in the indie groups are very much prevalent in the kan with the exception of the lineage proof issue. Such is why I do not claim it. That really sets yourself up for a pile.
I however regardless of group will always meet them first, If you wish I will send you an email with my personal view of all the ones I have met.
For example, Sensei Mike Stimmler. In Gettysburg. I am meeting him in May, he is 10 mins from my teacher whom I am off to see at the same time. He doesn't claim to have a teacher, he claims to have researched it and so on. OK I can see where that will draw critique no doubts. But i still want to meet him and get my own opinion. He may be a super cool guy who hasn't a clue, he may be very good, he may be an ***. So far he seems really nice. But we'll see right?
Some of the people that have been attacked on E-Budo like Jackson Wagner, who never claimed Ninjutsu, only that some Ninjutsu elements were in some of the sword systems he learned. I have trained with Jackson on multiple occasions and would love to see a detractor come at him on the mats for the "real" proof. He is without a doubt the most effective MA'st I have met. I have seen the video proof of his teaching liscence from Obata and Kimeda as well.
But again that is my opinion.