Not Sure What Happened in This Conversation

[marques]

Tony was the last one posting on this thread so I though it was becoming informative or useful.
But it is not, actually.

 

[drop bear]

Tony was the last one posting on this thread so I though it was becoming informative or useful.
But it is not, actually.

Here you go. We have changed our single leg entry to be the same as the double leg( Just a change in the head position ) A bit simpler to learn a bit harder to read.

 

[Tames D]

how many times are you going to bump this discussion that you say you're not interested in continuing? Your words and your actions are incongruous.

Time to bump this thread again...

 

[Gerry Seymour]

Here you go. We have changed our single leg entry to be the same as the double leg( Just a change in the head position ) A bit simpler to learn a bit harder to read.

I missed this. I'd actually like to see the version of single-leg and double-leg you're using. Can you point to a video of either or both? I teach a pretty rudimentary single-leg for defending from the ground (kneeling start), but haven't included a double-leg. If I had one entry for both, I might change my mind.

 

[drop bear]

I missed this. I'd actually like to see the version of single-leg and double-leg you're using. Can you point to a video of either or both? I teach a pretty rudimentary single-leg for defending from the ground (kneeling start), but haven't included a double-leg. If I had one entry for both, I might change my mind.

I will see what i can do. I will drop it on that other thread. You need the single if you are doing the double anyway because they are part of a combination.

 

[wingerjim]

This is a strange thread.

Very strange indeed....not sure why I am here lol