Isn't that a cop out though? What makes Aikido unsuitable for fighting against an aggressive opponent? If you're fighting someone on the street, they're going to be swinging on you similar to how a boxer or MMA fighter would.
Considering that mat the time of my departure I was a step away from instructor rank, yes I would consider myself advanced.
That's great. I don't really see what any of that has to do with the lack of Aikidoka fighting against non-compliant opponents from other styles. This situation tends to facilitate schools such as the one in the OP.
Maybe Bas Rutten can shine some light on this phenomenon;
Well, for starters, one mistake would be to assume that anyone in Aikido cares anything about what Bas Rutten says. To be honest, I didn't even know who he was and had to google him. Seems like a blowhard to me, but eh? Who knows....
Aikido is non competitive and takes years, IMO 7 or more, until you get really adept enough to use it in violent encounters. By that time, how many aikidoka who have been training in a non competitive format are going to be willing to then engage in competition?
Also, have you been in any street fights? I only ask, because I was in multiple fights back in my late teens and early 20's. I never saw anyone swing at me like an MMA fighter or boxer would. Most were undisciplined and swung wildly hoping to god that they hit something. I never saw anyone guard with their hands up...if they did, they dropped them the second they went in for a swing! I was also in the military and was in more than a few altercations in the military (drunken sailor things on the weekends), I never saw anyone fight like they did in a boxing match with the exception of one person......and he was the base boxing champ, he also just about knocked my *** out and I ended up with 3 stitches above my right eye because of him.
Here's the thing with Aikido. IMO, Aikido only works with a committed attack, if someone is just jabbing at you, and not committing to an attack, well....personally I would just step back and let them either commit or not, but you're not going to be able to use Aikido until they commit.
Personally, I hope I never fight again, and would never go looking for fights to "prove" that my Aikido works, and I would also argue that any ridiculous match in a ring is hardly proof of ANY martial arts effectiveness for fighting.
I'm a healthcare practitioner and researcher. There is a significant danger in extrapolating results from one setting to another. IE; Hyaluronic acid injections work great in the treatment of mild to moderate knee OA, ergo, hyaluronic acid injections work great in the treatment of mild to moderate OA everywhere in the body.....(they don't)....Or, X medication works great for the treatment of hypertension in patients with renal artery stenosis, ergo X medication works great in the treatment of all types of hypertension.....
Anytime a researcher or physician tries to make these claims, they are decidedly derided in the academic community for making errors in assumption and faulty conclusions.
It's the same with this. Making those sorts of extrapolations is akin the "No True Scotsman" type of logical fallacy. You can't make the conclusions that I keep seeing on this board with regard to MMA and MA effectiveness.
All you can conclude is that Martial Arts that are represented well and work well within the MMA context are well suited to MMA. THAT'S IT.....You can't take it any further without committing a whole bunch of errors of assumption.