JadecloudAlchemist
Master of Arts
Twinfist,
would you care to explain why you feel this way?
would you care to explain why you feel this way?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It means more along the line of you controling your opponent. In a self defense situation you do not have to stop anything but are in a dominant control setting resulting in the opponent being submitted and unable to move or attack similar to being pinned,restrained.submission" means they give up. so you stop.
submission arts, that is arts that are not designed to DESTROY the attackers ability to attack are foolish for self defense,
This is basically saying Judo,BJJ,Jujutsu,Aikido,and any art that allows submission holds like chokes,jointlocks,restraints are inferior.
I believe in breaking limbs, destroying joints, and knocking people out cold.
you miss the part about being useless vs multiples?
plus rolling around on concrete is NOT my idea of fun
and i might add:
judo=sport and useless vs multiples
bjj=sport and useless vs multiples
I really can not think of any Jujutsu that was designed for sport. Even BJJ was at first a martial art for defense before the more sporting side developed.Jjitsu isnt really a sport (depending on Ryu, some are sport) but is still useless vs multiples
Depends on how you train and your teacher. The Tenshin Aikido and Nihon Goshin Aikido among other styles will disagree.aikido i believe can be usefull for self defense, after about 20 years practice.
You are free to have your opinion and your method of protecting yourself.I am not a believer in "nice guy" self defense.
Have no intention. Your opinion is as valid as mine.Please, if you are thinking of converting or 'educating" me, dont.
jointlocks=bad
chokes=bad
restraints=bad
and i might add:
judo=sport and useless vs multiples
bjj=sport and useless vs multiples
aikido i believe can be usefull for self defense, after about 20 years practice.
I believe in breaking limbs, destroying joints, and knocking people out cold.
You're classifying a lot of things absolutely -- but there are plenty of people who can show you the difference between sport/practice and real application. A move that in practice and training stops at a lock becomes a break in real application. Or the lock or hold is held until the person truly surrenders, not just gives up. The difference is in how you train -- not the style. And several of those styles do have tactics for dealing with multiple attackers... they just aren't often demonstrated today.yes
jointlocks=bad
chokes=bad
restraints=bad
and i might add:
judo=sport and useless vs multiples
bjj=sport and useless vs multiples
Jjitsu isnt really a sport (depending on Ryu, some are sport) but is still useless vs multiples
aikido i believe can be usefull for self defense, after about 20 years practice.
I am not a believer in "nice guy" self defense.
I believe in breaking limbs, destroying joints, and knocking people out cold.
This is MY philosophy of self defense, i know many dont agree, and thats fine. I dont care. Please, if you are thinking of converting or 'educating" me, dont.
for one thing, it is off topic, and for another you would be wasting your time.
This is MY philosophy of self defense, i know many dont agree, and thats fine. I dont care. Please, if you are thinking of converting or 'educating" me, dont.
for one thing, it is off topic, and for another you would be wasting your time.
but i will never RELY on chokes, joint locks, or chokes.
and I will never roll around on the ground by choice.