Juany118
Senior Master
- Joined
- May 22, 2016
- Messages
- 3,107
- Reaction score
- 1,053
The OPs premise wrong imo. There is a spectrum of expertise; neophyte, novice, journeyman, expert, master or whatever synonyms you wish to use for the above terms.
I am a proficient fighter, it didn't take me years and years, I would likely put myself in the "journeyman" of sorts. One day I may redefine my skill level but that is a matter of not only time but effort.
The same applies to boxers. The best boxers start training in their youth and only after a few years of competition as teenagers as an amature move onto the pros. Even then it is usually many fights before people start saying they have adjusted to the pro level and even then they often get "better". You do have the occasional prodigy but it's all about hard work overtime, it's just that the "bigs" like Mayweather are essentially prodigies that bust the curve.
I will say TMAs are more complicated. You can have a prodigy that kicks butt as a fighter, who has the technical skill of a "master". Some TMAs would indeed call this prodigy a "master", others however have strong elements in their art that go beyond the fighting. Often these "soft skills", meditation, traditional medicine, philosophical understanding etc, take more time to learn and master than the "fighting" aspect. I would say an example of this would be Bruce Lee. By all accounts he was a good fighter as a kid, it took many years however for him to master his temper (which he only partially did) and become mature enough to start looking at the philosophical portion of the Martial Arts which brought him to the conclusion that in order to put his Philosophy into practice he would have to create his own Martial Art, which resulted in even more years of study to find the elements which fit with his Philosophy.
I am a proficient fighter, it didn't take me years and years, I would likely put myself in the "journeyman" of sorts. One day I may redefine my skill level but that is a matter of not only time but effort.
The same applies to boxers. The best boxers start training in their youth and only after a few years of competition as teenagers as an amature move onto the pros. Even then it is usually many fights before people start saying they have adjusted to the pro level and even then they often get "better". You do have the occasional prodigy but it's all about hard work overtime, it's just that the "bigs" like Mayweather are essentially prodigies that bust the curve.
I will say TMAs are more complicated. You can have a prodigy that kicks butt as a fighter, who has the technical skill of a "master". Some TMAs would indeed call this prodigy a "master", others however have strong elements in their art that go beyond the fighting. Often these "soft skills", meditation, traditional medicine, philosophical understanding etc, take more time to learn and master than the "fighting" aspect. I would say an example of this would be Bruce Lee. By all accounts he was a good fighter as a kid, it took many years however for him to master his temper (which he only partially did) and become mature enough to start looking at the philosophical portion of the Martial Arts which brought him to the conclusion that in order to put his Philosophy into practice he would have to create his own Martial Art, which resulted in even more years of study to find the elements which fit with his Philosophy.
Last edited: