So, the source is good enough to accept Armitage as the original source, but not good enough to recognize elsewhere.
Surely you don't expect for me to fall for that old trick?
If someone lays out A B and C which are known facts, it does not mean that D is also true. But it is a trick used in cases like this.
Crushing has it right in saying that being the wife of a CIA operative does not discredit Wilson in any way. In fact, it would bolster his accusations if made known. So the idea that Valerie was outed to discredit Wilson is silly. The only reason you have left is vengence. And you have to be pretty much a part of the "hate Bush for any excuse" crowd to think that people would be willing to risk federal law and put together a conspiracy of several people (some of whom oppose the Iraq war) in only a few days between the article and Armitage's goof.