I have been out of the arts for about 6 months now and out of any DKI/KI/Dragon Society pressure point based school for about 2 years but I have been researching a bit and a few friends still train.
I believe that combative pressure points the way the DKI types (this includes KI and Dragon Society) intellectualise them was originally designed as a marketing tool to promote Dillmans videos and to have people believe that there was more to his art than others including those that actually came from Okinawa and other places even though his was made in America.
I have met a few great people recently including a direct student of Master Yagi in Goju Ryu. Master Yagi was one of Chojun Miyagi's top students. He showed me a couple of things and we talked a bit and I found that even though he didn't know all of the TCM descriptions for the pressure points when extracted from the kata exactly as they are supposed to be all of the moves utilise pressure points. I know this isn't big news as it is commen knowledge that pressure points are in kata.
My point is this: I believe that due to the ridiculous amount of intellectualisation that has been done that the techniques practised in the Dillman type arts are less likely to be performed effectively in a high stress situation. This is because of the overload of useless info that is taught when if one just follows the kata exactly the technique will work everytime. When the mind is clouded with too many things in a high stress situation it cannot possibly perform at its best.
Why do westerners need to explain everything? Do you think the TCM description of points is necessary for self defence? Why? Is it now necessary to use this method as many people have changed kata too much so that these descriptions are are needed to try and make sense of these strange altered kata? Or has these methods of explanation simply come about due to western ego via people not willing to put the hard yards in with true masters and learn an art properly?
My apologies if this is a mish mash of thoughts but I didn't want to spend too long writing it
Cheers
Sam
I believe that combative pressure points the way the DKI types (this includes KI and Dragon Society) intellectualise them was originally designed as a marketing tool to promote Dillmans videos and to have people believe that there was more to his art than others including those that actually came from Okinawa and other places even though his was made in America.
I have met a few great people recently including a direct student of Master Yagi in Goju Ryu. Master Yagi was one of Chojun Miyagi's top students. He showed me a couple of things and we talked a bit and I found that even though he didn't know all of the TCM descriptions for the pressure points when extracted from the kata exactly as they are supposed to be all of the moves utilise pressure points. I know this isn't big news as it is commen knowledge that pressure points are in kata.
My point is this: I believe that due to the ridiculous amount of intellectualisation that has been done that the techniques practised in the Dillman type arts are less likely to be performed effectively in a high stress situation. This is because of the overload of useless info that is taught when if one just follows the kata exactly the technique will work everytime. When the mind is clouded with too many things in a high stress situation it cannot possibly perform at its best.
Why do westerners need to explain everything? Do you think the TCM description of points is necessary for self defence? Why? Is it now necessary to use this method as many people have changed kata too much so that these descriptions are are needed to try and make sense of these strange altered kata? Or has these methods of explanation simply come about due to western ego via people not willing to put the hard yards in with true masters and learn an art properly?
My apologies if this is a mish mash of thoughts but I didn't want to spend too long writing it
Cheers
Sam