Kong so do, also makes the the mistaken assumption that Funakoshi altered karate to meet some kind of Japanese "standard" what ever that means.
Rather arrogant presumption on your part. I've already stated some of the requirements i.e. standardized uniform, ranking structure and curriculum. It is not mistaken assumption, it is simply historical fact.
Yes he did alter the way he taught to groups of hundreds from the way he was taught one on one. But the reality was that it was the Japanese military machine that took karate and nationalized it and stripped it from it's okinawan heritage into a soldier making propaganda vehicle.
It was the government as a whole and not just the military.
It was not of any Okinawans doing.
Funakoshi was the one credited with introduction to mainland Japan.
However if anyone read the link I posted about the meeting in Okinawa on the name karate. It is clear that the Okinawans called their art "chinese hand" or just Te or tode but due to the Japanese pressure they agreed to the change to empty hand as well as concessions in the names of kata and the like.
Another of the standards I mentioned. You're helping to prove my point. Thank you.
Karate is not Japanese it's okinawan
No one said it was.
The service men you refer to were stationed in Okinawa not Japan.
Both. We've had U.S. servicemen and women stationed in Japan since the 1950's. It's part of the USFJ which is in the Pacific command.
The first authentic karate was brought to Massachusetts by George Mattson, uechi ryu karate.
Which wasn't called Uechi Ryu karate until the 1950's. Before that Uechi Kanbun Sensei identified it as Pangainoon (or depending upon who you talk to, a variation on that theme).