InfiniteLoop
Black Belt
So as I said in the first place... go kick something other than air.
I haven't asked but I'm pretty sure they wouldn't be up to sparring me with Nike shoes on....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So as I said in the first place... go kick something other than air.
True enough, but combat boots and tennis shoe could not be more different.Why does he adress a straw man? You don't need to pull back any toes with shoes, correct, so why not just kick with the same target ?
One of the most common questions you get with this techinique is, how are you supposed to curve your toes when you have shoes on? You are not. Since Gen. Choi's TKD was designed for the military, the roundhouse kick while wearing combat boots is to kick the opponent's target with the shoe tip.Rayners Lane Taekwon-do Academy
Rayners Lane Taekwon-do Academy, dedicated to teaching Taekwon-do as it was originally perceivedwww.raynerslanetkd.com
I have a recorded TKO using a ball of the foot roundhouse to the solar plexus. Great for slipping right between the blocks.I taught roundhouse with both the instep and the ball of the foot. Students threw them both ways but chose which was best for them. Barefoot, with shoes, sneakers etc. Bag work, shields and sparring.
I honestly can't remember even one student that chose the ball of the foot. Mainlly because it's slower
and has less reach
But I'm sure a lot of people love it. It's all good if it works for you.
True enough, but combat boots and tennis shoe could not be more different.
Ball of the foot is illegal these days in Olympics. Or more correctly: "non scoring"I have a recorded TKO using a ball of the foot roundhouse to the solar plexus. Guy had a hogu on and I had exposed toe shin/instep pads on. Later found out it broke a rib at the sternum.
Someone mentioned the part of the foot used should be the kickers choice. I could not agree more.
Not correct. I have kicked hard enough in tennis shoes to hurt my foot. Even in 'combat boots' if a person gets on top of the boot at all it could still hurt; steel toes being the exception.But his point wasn't about the boot but the toes... which is a mute point regardless of what shoe you wear and it doesn't impact using the same surface
Not correct. I have kicked hard enough in tennis shoes to hurt my foot. Even in 'combat boots' if a person gets on top of the boot at all it could still hurt; steel toes being the exception.
How so? It has always been legal in certain areas to my knowledge. It would score with an e-hogu I think.Ball of the foot is illegal these days in Olympics. Or more correctly: "non scoring"
How so? It has always been legal in certain areas to my knowledge. It would score with an e-hogu I think.
In the days of the 3-score rules (shutter/knockdown/knockout) where knock downs were common it was definitely an effective kick.
Sad too because it is a very, very effective SD tool.
I was initially taught exclusively to use the ball for front and roundhouse kicks and the best I remember, that was what I got hit with in competitive sparring most of the time. I don't agree it's slower or has less reach.I honestly can't remember even one student that chose the ball of the foot. Mainlly because it's slower
and has less reach
But I'm sure a lot of people love it. It's all good if it works for you.
I was initially taught exclusively to use the ball for front and roundhouse kicks and the best I remember, that was what I got hit with in competitive sparring most of the time. I don't agree it's slower or has less reach.
Sure, but it is not illegal either. Every kick is not going to score.What do you mean how? A decision was made that It's not a scoring technique anymore.
It probably is if the taken to an extreme in which the receiver gets hurt by somebody who repeatedly does it, and he points it out more than once. But anyway, it has resulted in the technique being extinct.Sure, but it is not illegal either. Every kick is not going to score.
As much as they have softened up the scoring in the sport I would not be surprised to find a ball of the foot roundhouse is illegal.It probably is if the taken to an extreme in which the receiver gets hurt by somebody who repea.tedly does it, and he points it out more than once. But anyway, it has resulted in the technique being extinct.
It is legal and scoring in ITF, I believe, but I have yet to see it in an ITF competition.
As much as they have softened up the scoring in the sport I would not be surprised to find a ball of the foot roundhouse is illegal.
But how do you account for a good, solid heel from a head shot side kick scoring? Or the devastating wheel kicks that still occur?
I still think it would score on an e-hogu.
I can't agree with that. The only exception would be in the pure sport environment of WT sparring, which is very bound by a ruleset. Saying it is an irrelevant kick is crazy talk IMHO.I don't believe that it has to do with softening the sport. More that the technique isn't considered relevant anymore. It was already so rare. Just a final nail in the coffin.
I still think it would score on an e-hogu.
Do you only spar?
Bottom line, no. The instep and ball of the foot kicks are different kicks, which serve different purposes. Impact with the instep is meant to transfer the power of the kick across a broader area. It is often taught in karate as a 'sticky' kick, meaning it doesn't immediately recoil. The ball of the foot is a penetrating kick, and it recoils instantly.I have a new found love for ball of the foot as the dollyo chagi kicking tool and I'm curious If you guys think it’s too artificial when wearing modern shoes?
It looks pretty violent to me... I'm sure it would hurt?
You are neglecting the fact that the instep is hard, ball of the foot is soft...power is measured by force of the kick and the surface area to which it is applied. Two kicks with the same force, the smaller surface area will penetrate more. Which is why knives are used to stab and not baseball bats.