- Joined
- Jun 9, 2006
- Messages
- 3,692
- Reaction score
- 176
And presumably you'll look down and whisper, "No."
At this point, so would I. *shrug*.
(Kudos on the Watchmen reference BTW)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And presumably you'll look down and whisper, "No."
The thing I suppose we forget is that we did invade Iraq and while we see it as liberating them they don't necessarily see it that way. Turn it around, a lot of Americans don't like Bush but how would they feel if Russia/China whoever came along and invaded America to 'rid' you of Bush? Many of you aren't Obama fans but would you tolerate another country deposing him thinking that it's for the greater good and they were giving you back democracy or would you resist the invasion? Saddam was appalling but he was the Iraqis appalling guy and while they are glad to be rid of him they also want us gone.
The thing is - in that reporter's culture, the sole of the shoe is the worst thing that could ever touch a person.
Indeed! Isn't homosexual contact and nudity even worse?He may reconsider his position on this after a few months in prison.
Why am I seeing a bad Disney movie starring George Bush and Jackie Chan?
Nice dodge! Especially the first one.
j
There's a weird double standard buried deep in all of this, and I don't just mean the biases against Bush. When conservatives hold up unsavory Muslims or Arabs as representative of the region's problems, we're told how simplistic and two-dimensional we're being. But when the same sort of unsavory doofus behaves in ways that confirm liberal biases and coform to liberal passions, then suddenly this doofus speaks for millions.
Questions That I Have for the Secret Service
Jon Friedman |
1. Shouldn't you have jumped in front of that shoe?
2. Shouldn't you have jumped in front of that second shoe?
3. Second shoe = the one thrown after being removed from foot after first shoe was thrown.
4. Let's say people had three feet. Would you have allowed a third shoe to fly unimpeded?
5. While the shoe was in the air, were you like, "Oh, its just a shoe."
6. Same question about the second shoe.
7. Do you think this is funny, "Throw a shoe at me once, shame on--you. Throw a shoe--you throw a shoe, you can't throw a shoe again."
8. Is there not "protection training" for lunatics launching objects?
9. Let's say there isn't training for that--but do they tell you that if someone does throw (or shoot) something to be on the alert in case they want to repeat this behavior?
10. Where were you?
BONUS QUESTION: Do you think the Iraqis want us there? (Hint: their journalists are throwing their shoes at Bush)
I question how good the secret service is after that. That just watched the first shoe. Then watched the second shoe. Then stood around and stared.
If the secret service won't take a shoe, would they take a bullet?
AoG
you can lead a country to civilazation, but you cant make them not be jerks