My point was there is no terminal velocity. There is no reason the kick would stop accelerating.
I would have thought constant acceleration throughout the kick would be the obvious conclusion. Not six inches of acceleration and then for no reason at all having that acceleration stop.
That is my point about terminal velocity if I am kicking that action accelerates the kick. That kickng procces continues throughout the kick untill I run out of leg.
You 6 inches of mystery change to the kick is a lot harder to explain.
If i can be bothered i am pretty sure I can find the physics reflected in a lot of swinging impact movement.
Golf backswings would be a good example.
you back to calling it terminal velocity Again, do you know what terminal velocity is? Clearly not, if you don't know that, then you won't understand any explanation given
if you are claiming that a kick keeps accelerating till contact then YOU prove it
Why don't neither of you prove it?
But seriously, I think it's much more logical to assume you will keep accelerating, then that you will suddenly stop accelerating mid kick. In that case, the person coming from the illogical sounding position should have to prove why their theory would be correct. The logical-sounding position can support it with just logic.