Runs With Fire
Black Belt
I ask everyone who stops in (not many make the trip) the same question "how do you like your coffee?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fighters are fighters. Give a great pro boxer from 50 years ago access to today’s advances in training equipment and access to today’s knowledge of exercise physiology, and he’ll be just as great today. Sure the talent pool has increased, but so have their abilities.People always make this assumption that skill goes upwards, when we dont actually know that for certain. We know technology goes upwards, but that doesnt always mean skill does. A simple example: quick math skills. Most people i know a generation ahead of me are better at math in their head, while people in my generation have trouble with basic addition/subtraction.
I would be interested in showing them what MA is like now, and see what they know that i dont. I would not make the presumption 'modern' is more effective off the bat.
Ancient = old enough to actually it in battle, village fights, etc. This would vary based on where the person lives in the world and at what period they lived in. Ancient was just the best way I could describe it without having a long drawn out explanation, so it will get you in the ball park lol.don’t know how we’re defining ancient,
Nice one. I didn't even think about that. Lost fighting systems. Did they vanish because they were ineffective or it just wasn't promoted and passed on effectively. Definite makes me rethink my approach.I’ll go with any martial artist no longer alive that’s been written about
If you compare math from 1000 years ago to now you'll see great improvement. Not just with "new math," but applying "old math" in new ways. Some countries advance faster in math than others, but it's always improving.Most people i know a generation ahead of me are better at math in their head, while people in my generation have trouble with basic addition/subtraction.
Actually yes. I think he would counter in a unique way. I can show you examples of different ways to respond to a punch in everything from street fight to sports fighting.Do you think he would counter and return the favor in some truly unique way?
Thats fair, bad example. But its not that way with everything, particularly skilled labor. Things arent always just on a continuous uphill climb, we just happen to perceive it that way. One of my old professors posited we like to do this, since it means we are always at the top.If you compare math from 1000 years ago to now you'll see great improvement. Not just with "new math," but applying "old math" in new ways. Some countries advance faster in math than others, but it's always improving.
Math was the example you gave so I just followed up on the same example.Thats fair, bad example. But its not that way with everything, particularly skilled labor. Things arent always just on a continuous uphill climb, we just happen to perceive it that way. One of my old professors posited we like to do this, since it means we are always at the top.
I have a thought on that, that is new/enlightening to me..will have to process it and flesh it out before i put it down.Math was the example you gave so I just followed up on the same example.
Today's wheel is better than it was 1000 years ago. Medicine is better than it was 1000 years ago. Homes for the most part are better than they were 1000 years ago. Human communication is much better than it was 1000 years ago. Our health is much better than it was 1000 years ago. Even though we have cut down a lot of trees, we have made better improvements to some environments than what they were 1000 years ago. We are able to grow food in areas that were actually desert areas. The flip side is that we produce more pollution and trash than ever before. Depending on which side you are on, more trash and more pollution may be an improvement. Today's "Trash Man" is better skilled than a "Trash Man" 1000 years ago. There have been stumbling blocks and in some cased animals and cultures have gone extinct but over all much has improved.
Many times the things that don't improve are things that eventually disappear.
Modern is not always better than the ancient.Today's wheel is better than it was 1000 years ago.
This is more so dependent on the training approach opposed to TMA itself. The overwhelmingly majority of the various TMA I've trained in prepared us for techniques outside of our system. Though there are many schools that do what you say, I find those to be either low-quality schools or schools that insist on "purity".I'm more on the lines that people who practice TMA and try to fight with the techniques don't fight outside of their system, so all of the applications and approaches are based on Style A vs Style A.
This is also dependent on training approach and school rules. One Kung Fu school I went allowed grappling and takedowns in sparring. I was by no means a great grappler, but I could manage to get a single of double leg on a lot of the students. It frustrated a lot of the students but it was a fair move. However, the Karate school I went to would drill us on grappling and takedown defense because they knew grappling was a reality we might face in a confrontation. Thus taking the Karate students down was much more difficult. In essence, the TMA community is very diverse in training methods/approaches and is very dependent on the school itself.Once it becomes a Style A vs Style B the TMA guy simply just doesn't have the exposure to what he's being attacked with to be to use any of the techniques.
People always make this assumption that skill goes upwards, when we dont actually know that for certain. We know technology goes upwards, but that doesnt always mean skill does. A simple example: quick math skills. Most people i know a generation ahead of me are better at math in their head, while people in my generation have trouble with basic addition/subtraction.