Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
^^^^^ Yes, it is.
I've heard this from other KM folks. In my opinion, it's marketing. It's to differentiate it from those schools that teach a lot of fairly esoteric bits, those that focus on competition rather than self-defense, etc. As most of us would define "martial art", KM definitely fits the definition. Nearly any art could be simplified down to the most commonly "practical" effective moves, leaving out those movements that are used to teach principles or to help understand the history of the art or just to provide another area for learning the art once you have the basics down. I think that's the crux of what they point to as the difference.It's weird though. While I agree it is a hybrid there is a hardcore ex-IDF instructor in my area. By hardcore I mean he teaches his class in a local park, rain or shine, 12 months out of the year so you are training in "real" conditions. Sadly my work schedule started to not match his class times. During our first conversation he rather sharply corrected me as follows..."Krav Maga is not a Martial art, it is a fighting system." I have met other instructors who say the same, as such I sometimes purposefully remove it from conversations about "Martial Arts" and only raise it in conversations about "self-defense."
I've heard this from other KM folks. In my opinion, it's marketing. It's to differentiate it from those schools that teach a lot of fairly esoteric bits, those that focus on competition rather than self-defense, etc. As most of us would define "martial art", KM definitely fits the definition. Nearly any art could be simplified down to the most commonly "practical" effective moves, leaving out those movements that are used to teach principles or to help understand the history of the art or just to provide another area for learning the art once you have the basics down. I think that's the crux of what they point to as the difference.
I got the feeling from this guy though from additional conversations that he saw a "Martial Art" as something that had a philosophical and degree of tradition behind it. He didn't appear to be elitist, at least this guy. It was more like "I am modern, I don't have history. I was developed by exploiting the history of others."
Now this might be this is an ex-IDF guy who is 60ish and so really gets it from the source and not from the marketing? All the other instructors I have spoken to on this are also his students so I may well b e hearing what amounts to the same voice. What confused me I think was the humility implied by it. I kinda read it as "our stuff works at least as well, if not better, but we are missing that one thing."
If that's his distinction, he's right, though the same could be said of NGA a mere 70 years ago, and it would have been called a martial art from the beginning. Perhaps he's talking about the traditions and some of the cultural carry-over seen in many Eastern MA. Since many people do, in fact, equate "martial art" with "Eastern martial art", that's a distinction that some will make, and would be a valid distinction for Krav Maga. However, if we do that, we have to exclude boxing, Savate, and fencing, because they aren't Eastern. Okay, we could leave fencing in if we acknowledge the level of tradition and ritual is similar to many Eastern-based arts. But then we're working the distinction between "traditional martial arts" and "non-traditional (or modern) martial arts".
In any case, by my definition, KM counts as a "martial art". I've yet to come up with a decent definition for "system" that doesn't end up being roughly the same as my definition for "martial art".
I don't see how history differentiates KM from NGA by any significant factor. 70 years ago, NGA was brand new, a hybrid art based largely on Daito-ryu, with some heavy influences from other arts (reportedly Shotokan, Judo, perhaps Shioda's Aikido). Today, KM is a relatively new hybrid art.I think the only thing that makes me hesitate at calling KM, MMA etc a "martial art" vs a system is that I admittedly have an obsession with history (pops being a History Professor will do that to ya). As such I tend to see things in a very progressive step by step sorta way. So will they eventually become "martial arts?". Indeed they will. I at least don't square MA with the east. Savate, Fencing (my first MA actually), these are Martial Arts but, and this may seem corny, I think like a good wine or whiskey they need time to "mellow", to find that truly unique space. That time is not fixed mind you, each becomes "right" in its own time, but to me it is the honest Master's of the style that are the best judge of when that is just like the honest Vintner.
I don't see how history differentiates KM from NGA by any significant factor. 70 years ago, NGA was brand new, a hybrid art based largely on Daito-ryu, with some heavy influences from other arts (reportedly Shotokan, Judo, perhaps Shioda's Aikido). Today, KM is a relatively new hybrid art.
I won't call MMA a martial art for two reasons. The first is sheer stubbornness, based upon the term "Mixed Martial Arts". This one is pure semantics. To me, MMA still refers to a type of competition. The second reason is the more well-grounded: most folks training for MMA competition still train in concepts from more than one art, and there's no complete system in most MMA gyms, just an active blending of several styles (and not the same styles in all places). There are some gyms, however, where they've put together a complete system. If we looked at just those, I'd have to call MMA an art, just like I'd call boxing a martial art.
For me, the distinction between "system" and "art" is mostly that the system is the concepts and principles behind the art. A fairly vague difference in my mind.
Wing Tai. Another modern hybrid system that makes use of Wing Chun:
Good feedback. I wasn't trying to comment on the value or validity of what he is doing. Only that hybrid arts are still out there. And what the heck is that Klingon-looking weapon that they use??!!!
I call Bogus Bat'leth! (See 0:46 in the second clip above). Real Klingons don't use polypropylene-trainers. They start their kids off with one of these:
View attachment 20018
Good feedback. I wasn't trying to comment on the value or validity of what he is doing. Only that hybrid arts are still out there. And what the heck is that Klingon-looking weapon that they use??!!!