How does your style judge patterns? By this I don't mean what is your style's opinion of patterns; I mean that, if your style performs patterns (forms, tuls, palgwe, whatever you call them), how are they judged? In Ch'ang H'on TKD, the following points are observed, per The Encyclopedia of Taekwon-Do, by Gen. Choi, Hong Hi:
Now, some of these are used as the basis for judging patterns; others are inherent in the patterns learned at each rank, such as #9. Does your style have a codified set of criteria that determine if a pattern is performed correctly? If so, what are they, and are they written down, or passed on orally? If not, do you think such criteria would be useful?
[/COLOR]
9 Points to be observed while performing patterns:
1) Accuracy. A pattern should begin and end on the same spot.
2) Correct posture and facing should be maintained at all times.
3) The muscles of the body should be tensed and relaxed at the proper moments.
4) A pattern should be performed in rhythmic movements with an absence of stiffness.
5) Moves should accelerate or decelerate, according to the instructions.
6) Each pattern should be perfected before moving on to the next.
7) Students should know the purpose of each movement.
8) Students should perform each movement with realism.
9) Attack and defense techniques should be equally distributed among left and right hands and feet.
Now, some of these are used as the basis for judging patterns; others are inherent in the patterns learned at each rank, such as #9. Does your style have a codified set of criteria that determine if a pattern is performed correctly? If so, what are they, and are they written down, or passed on orally? If not, do you think such criteria would be useful?
[/COLOR]