2 simple words, yet both can have a number of different meanings for people.
So, let the discussion begin. How do you define it?
So, let the discussion begin. How do you define it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Boxing is an art. End of story.loaded question.
see, i have always put martial arts into a different list than "fighting systems"
boxing is a fighting system, but, IMO, not a martial art
martial art: system of rules and techniques designed to enable the student to deal with combat situations.
Boxing is an art. End of story.
Sean
I knew you would understand.well, i am glad you are in change and get to make those decisions for everyone...............
Martial Arts is any fighting system that includes - punching, kicking, submissions, throwdowns, elbows, knees and/or any other part of the body that you can use to protect yourself and destroy your opponent... or is that street fighting?
So the question remains - what is the definition of Martial Arts, to you?Street fighting is what the guy that 'attacks' you is doing, what we of course do is martial arts therefore far more dignified.
Martial Arts is any fighting system that includes - punching, kicking, submissions, throwdowns, elbows, knees and/or any other part of the body that you can use to protect yourself and destroy your opponent... or is that street fighting?
Different topic... but if weapons are to be included on this thread - I'll take the fighter jet plane with nuclear and atomic bombs and destroy my opponent from a far away distance where I don't have to view the inevitable disaster.What about weapons? Knives, swords, bows, or guns, etc?
Different topic... but if weapons are to be included on this thread - I'll take the fighter jet plane with nuclear and atomic bombs and destroy my opponent from a far away distance where I don't have to view the inevitable disaster.
Really? Aren't there styles that are known as "empty hand"? And I can't think of any wars prosecuted by unarmed people, at the moment, but there have been some where the multitudes have taken to the streets - without arms, in peaceful protest against their own government and won without a single shot being fired. Isn't that what happened in Egypt just recently?I guess it is hard for me to imagine a "martial" art not including weapons, how many wars do you know that were prosecuted by unarmed people?
And yes, flying a fighter jet is certainly a modern martial art.
Really? Aren't there styles that are known as "empty hand"? And I can't think of any wars prosecuted by unarmed people, at the moment, but there have been some where the multitudes have taken to the streets - without arms, in peaceful protest against their own government and won without a single shot being fired. Isn't that what happened in Egypt just recently?
OOOPS! Goes to show how poorly educated we are about the world, outside the US, I'm sorry to say.No, people died and were wounded. An American reporter was sexually assaulted. People on both sides used weapons. it was a pretty unpleasant time for most.
Point well made. I agree.IMO, its learning to fight. Just my opinion, but I dont feel that at the inception of the various arts, that they were designed for anything but fighting. As times went on, people began to reap other benefits from them, such as we see today, ie: fitness, inner peace, etc.