Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The straight lead has nothing to do with FMA, not even close...
So you deny that while lacking power its speed and position in the by jhong stance can be used to distract or put off the opponent to follow up with the more telegraphed and slower cross?
Sure its an attack and not and attack by drawing as destructions are but the pain and distraction it causes to make follow ups possible runs along the same concept as destructions.
Perhaps you thought i meant to attribute it to the FMA, which with the Philippines impact on western boxing is not that much of an unfair thing to say, i was not in fact and it was only meant to be a comparison.
Of course it can be, as can anything. Why one would plan to, from a strong side lead, follow a fast and powerful straight lead strike with a weaker,slower cross is beyond me. Personally, I'd simply seek connectivity and move from there...So you deny that while lacking power its speed and position in the by jhong stance can be used to distract or put off the opponent to follow up with the more telegraphed and slower cross?
Of course it can be, as can anything. Why one would plan to, from a strong side lead, follow a fast and powerful straight lead strike with a weaker,slower cross is beyond me. Personally, I'd simply seek connectivity and move from there...
However, the complexity of the straight lead really has nothing to do with what one chooses to follow it up with - that's quite another story. What it does have a lot to do with is proper mechanics, speed, accuracy, timing, and focus on non-telegraphy. What it isn't is a jab......
Why one would plan to, from a strong side lead, follow a fast and powerful straight lead strike with a weaker,slower cross is beyond me.
Sure, I can't disagree with any of that. The emphasis was on "plan", though..... But, I see your point. I've not progressed to the point where my left is anything other than weaker than my right. My right side is my strong side, and, though it should not get as much attention as it does, it gets more attention, thereby keeping me, undoubtedly, right side strong. It's a vicious circle and a perpetual bad habit.That is one of the first things we learned from our instructors and you should know why as well. "You're" weaker cross shouldn't be weaker at all. That is if you put your "time in" on your right lead. Your rear cross is only one tool in the toolbox and the tool must conform to the box and not vice versa. JKD "was" deep into intercepting so the right lead was perfected. Strong side forward makes for a better "game" with all the tools if their JKD is more than "in name only."
My friend, they must of "planned" on it not being weaker.Sure, I can't disagree with any of that. The emphasis was on "plan", though..... But, I see your point. I've not progressed to the point where my left is anything other than weaker than my right. My right side is my strong side, and, though it should not get as much attention as it does, it gets more attention, thereby keeping me, undoubtedly, right side strong. It's a vicious circle and a perpetual bad habit.
LOL! Touche.....My friend, they must of "planned" on it not being weaker.