History of Liberals and Conservatives

[Tgace]

Q. How many liberals does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A. That's not funny.

A. Two, one Democrat to hold it and one newscaster to spin it.

A. Too many. Half a turn in and they always declare it a quagmire.

A. One, but those idiots always turn it to the left and then wonder why it doesn't work.

A. Just one, but the rest think he's a homophobe because he always marries male light-bulbs to female sockets.

A. None, God said let there be light so the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional.

A. Two, Bill Clinton and who ever you put in there with him.

A. I'll have to get back to you. The resolution on that is stalled in the UN.

A."Stop Questioning My Patriotism!"

A. "Look! Karl Rove!" (sound of footsteps running away)

A. It's Bush's fault that the light bulb needs changing. It's just a conspiracy to benefit big corporations that want to sell more lightbulbs to line Bushitler's pocket with. No war for oil.

 

[Sapper6]

:rofl:

now see, this stuff is funny.

 

[Tgace]

I cant decide which is more amusing, the jokes or the indignant posts.

 

[Cryozombie]

A. None, God said let there be light so the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional.

SO THATS why they are always in the dark.

Hehe

Sorry. Couldnt help myself.

 

[JannaB]

As a "testorone-filled" liberal female, I have to say that I agree with you Conservatives. That article was hysterical to me because the thought of trying to pretend that Conservatives are charitable OR Constitutional makes me laugh my a** off!

 

[heretic888]

Oy vey.

 

[RandomPhantom700]

Dude, get a life. Yeah, it was a stupid, satirical overgeneralization. But it was meant as a friggin' joke and I found it amusing. I'm not going to waste any more time talking about it either.

It was not a joke, and it was not satirical. It was an insult, directed at an entire political group. If reading past the 3rd paragraph doesn't indicate this, then seeing that the author chose not to give his name definitely should. And he speaks of sissies. It's derogatory towards women, liberals, and anyone who's not a raw-meat eating beer-guzzling arch-conservative, and Tgace meant it as a derogatory insult by posting it here. Do not try to pawn it off as anything else. Heretic's response was appropriate.

 

[Marginal]

http://www.worldmagblog.com/blog/archives/014688.html

Oh, there are plenty of jokes, insane poo chuckers to match the Hannity's etc. Funny thing is, they're commonly labeled traitors, and not considered even remotely amusing by the red-faced gasket blowers.

 

[Cryozombie]

It was not a joke, and it was not satirical. It was an insult, directed at an entire political group. If reading past the 3rd paragraph doesn't indicate this, then seeing that the author chose not to give his name definitely should. And he speaks of sissies. It's derogatory towards women, liberals, and anyone who's not a raw-meat eating beer-guzzling arch-conservative, and Tgace meant it as a derogatory insult by posting it here. Do not try to pawn it off as anything else. Heretic's response was appropriate.

Yeah... while most of what Tom Posted in this thread I would say are jokes... I hafta agree... that was just insults veiled behind a paragraph or two that was tongue in cheek. Clearly written with an adgenda.