Originally posted by Eraser
OK...
I hoope this thread doesn't start a war...(naw.. im sure we can all be cool in here right??)
BUt im still on Hapkidoist side.. only because.. of my instructors.. yes they are young.. but they have been in Hapkido for 15 yrs now.. and when you see how they teach.. and the skill level they do have you can then understand that they do deserve the rank they have.. NOW.. dont get me wrong, there are some people that have Dan ranks that don't deserve them..
But I KNow that's not the case with my school.. don't believe me.. come on down and see for yourself.. our school door is open to everyone!!!
It is not so much the rank for being a good teacher.
You can be a 1st dan and be a better teacher than even the grandmaster in terms of teaching ability, not skill or knowledge or experience. The question is, if he deserved the belt in real conditions?
Example...
One testing period over a span of a day to whatever depending on what rank you were going for:
Basic techniques
Basic drills
Memorization of Codes
Ability to apply the codes and showing it (yes, people watch you)
Stamina
Some sort of mind endurance test (it differs. I had to do numerous pushups over a small creek with an instructor with a stick and it gets pretty cold in Korea)
Weapons
Breaking
Forms
Sparring and more sparring
And a mistake, something as small as doing a walking stance instead of a front stance in a form could cost you. Although you have more room to make mistakes in combat (weapons and hand-to-hand), it was pretty tough. I failed many tests. 99.999% would fail at least 5 tests by the time they reach 2nd dan.
Now, does that mean people can go with lower ITF or WTF standards and get black belts? Yes, but I wouldn't say they deserve it in military TKD standards, not at all, not even close. Does that mean there aren't a lot of hard trainers? No, but I doubt that they've been exposed to such conditions.