Okay, it's going to be one of those...
I am basically saying that there are reasons to do things and do look upon these reasons of the "why", instead of "just doing"
How's this for a reason: because it's part of the systems training. If you don't want to do it, don't train in that system. You obviously don't want it, you don't train it, but that doesn't mean that it's wrong, or the reasons for training it for others isn't valid. As a result, your entire argument is really beside the point of this thread. Give it up.
Potentital, er, the word should be changed to more likely
"Potentital"? Well, I'd change it into English first... but no, it shouldn't be changed to "more likely". Potential side effects/injuries etc are really only present if the conditioning is approached badly, taught badly (or done without guidance) in the first place. When done properly, there's really no issue in that regard. And that's coming from someone with nearly 20 years of conditioning experience here... what was yours again?
I dont care how "properly" one thinks they are doing it. The body can oonly withstand a degree os this and then age catches up.
But I guess, no one care to interview old asters who have done this and have suffered from side effects
Can you answer whether or not you've got any actual experience to back this up with? Because you really don't seem to know how conditioning is achieved here.
Nope. As I stated somewhere, some look upon the "potential need" to condition, and focus on this, than utilising a variety that exist
So, thanks, you proved my point. (From one of my other posts)
I hardly proved any point you've tried to make, mate. You have stated that the reason not to do so is because the student might never end up in a fight, making all the effort put into conditioning moot... you have, however, been presented with other possible reasons, or needs, for the training, but seem to have refused to acknowledge them.
Oh, and if you could possibly manage some grammar in one of your posts, that'd be appreciated (I have no idea what "...and focus on this,
than utilising a variety that exist" is supposed to actually mean...).
Yeah, and they did this why? I guess they were in a modern society....
No, they weren't. You may want to start reading up a bit more before announcing your understanding of history...
Sure it does. It is as much a thing to do not from modern necessity as hardcore conditioning and breaking, etc
(Me) "I really don't know what high-kicking has to do with anything there...."
(You) "Sure it does".
Dude, grammar. Please. Sure it does... what? Have something to do with the discussion of hand conditioning? Are you serious? Do you have a clue about what makes a martial art, and why it does things the way it does? Or do you just feel that any martial artist that does something you don't get shouldn't do it, regardless of which art they're training in?
Prevent injuries....Nah, its about doing something so much, that you need to apply a ointment to aid
No, it's not. That's not what the ointment is for (the way you're saying it). You really don't have a single days experience in this, do you? Or are you going to avoid answering that question again?
Yep-FAD...You dont need it in modern society to survive.....
Firstly, that's not the definition of a fad. In fact, the definition of a fad centers on it's position in a modern society, so I really think you should rethink the words you're choosing here.
That said, you're showing (again) a huge lack of understanding of martial arts, and why they're trained today again.
I am not or never stated to "get rid of martial arts" I am saying that if it was such a "grand puba" of something needed, why aren't the masses doing it, leaving a few to not (per vise versa)
Except you're on a martial arts forum, arguing that essential aspects of some arts shouldn't be trained, as you can't see value in them, which has turned to you saying that there isn't really much value in martial arts at all (in a modern society)... I really have to ask again, what the hell are you doing here?
Wow. I guess you got me there. I guess you also proved my point about the "minority" (CMA)
Are you delusional?!? There is nothing in my post that "proves" anything close to a point for you.
One can be a part of anything. And thus, once they were for many years, they can speak their mind on what they dont agree with....
Except you're talking absolute garbage, and have shown no ability to take on board anything you're being told. Honestly, the only reason I can see for what you're doing is that you're enjoying trolling.
Again, I am not really stating that it is "ALL POINTLESS", I am stating how people get obessed wiith something, esp not of necessity in modern society.
Think of it as religion.
Everyone is out there claiming theirs is the way to go.
But there is so much out there, that too many people "put on blinders"
Again, you're saying that because you don't see value, no-one should do it.
How about you take this on board, Rickster... this thread is about the proper methods for hand conditioning within Chinese martial arts. It is not about whether or not one should engage in hand conditioning. So, if you don't have anything to say about correct methods (and saying that you think everyone who does it gets injured and "needs ointment" really just shows you don't have a clue about the actual methods, so you know), I'd suggest refraining from getting involved. But if you do decide to post again, can you do us one favour? Answer the damn questions you've been asked before you get to anything else. It's just good netiquette...