I posted this tidbit in the Study earlier, but it's certainly worth posting here as well.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,315563,00.html
I guess someone forgot to tell the bad guy that guns weren't allowed in the mall...
There are more examples in that article, and it's certainly worth reading.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,315563,00.html
I guess someone forgot to tell the bad guy that guns weren't allowed in the mall...
Media Coverage of Mall Shooting Fails to Reveal Mall's Gun-Free-Zone Status
Thursday, December 06, 2007
By John R. Lott, Jr.
The horrible tragedy at the Westroads Mall in Omaha, Neb. received a lot of attention Wednesday and Thursday. It should have. Eight people were killed, and five were wounded.
A Google news search using the phrase "Omaha Mall Shooting" finds an incredible 2,794 news stories worldwide for the last day. From India and Taiwan to Britain and Austria, there are probably few people in the world who havenÂ’t heard about this tragedy.
But despite the massive news coverage, none of the media coverage, at least by 10 a.m. Thursday, mentioned this central fact: Yet another attack occurred in a gun-free zone.
Surely, with all the reporters who appear at these crime scenes and seemingly interview virtually everyone there, why didnÂ’t one simply mention the signs that ban guns from the premises?
Nebraska allows people to carry permitted concealed handguns, but it allows property owners, such as the Westroads Mall, to post signs banning permit holders from legally carrying guns on their property.
There are more examples in that article, and it's certainly worth reading.