Archangel M
Senior Master
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2007
- Messages
- 4,555
- Reaction score
- 154
And who is to say that different sorts of records have different retention regulations.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And who is to say that different sorts of records have different retention regulations.
This letter is in response to your request seeking access to and copies of the documentary evidence referred to in footnote 130 of Chapter 5 of the September 11 (9/11) Commission Report.
***
We have been advised that the potentially responsive records have been destroyed.
Some poor reading skills, though.
The article came out on Zero Hedge on 6/15. I became aware of it a few days later. Since then, I've been poking around various regulations and websites and I can't find anything in regards to an official SEC RRP. What I do find is an assurance that they keep everything and that you can search various data bases or file FIOAs in order to get the documents you want. They have been collecting information back to 1934.
Now, lets look at the information the SEC collects.
Here is a list of forms that the SEC collects with documentation.
Here is one of the forms that pertains to the question at hand. This form is available on EDGAR, supplementary documentation is available upon request.
Please note that consolidated financial reports are a part of this filing. This means that traders who placed the put-options with the firms would have been found in this information.
Therefore, we can conclude that the SEC had the information on who was insider trading and destroyed it. We can also conclude that this information was supposed to be available upon request, but was destroyed.
Was this a mistake or was this part of an effort to cover up insider trading links? It is not unreasonable to consider this possibility because key documentation has been destroyed for other cases in the past. Corruption is a reasonable expectation in an agency whose head was one Bernie Madoff. A lot of the reason why investigators are having issues discovering the origin of various exotic financial products is because the supplemental documentation has gone missing or has been destroyed.
What all of this documentation would show if it was available is that insiders associated with the CIA placed put-options on airlines based on inside information and profited from the attacks of 9/11. Essentially, this information would prove that certain individuals knew in advance that American and United airlines would suffer some sort of catastrophe and that their stock prices would drop sharply. This indicates that certain individuals had foreknowledge of the attacks. If one of these individuals were to take the stand and were subject to questioning, they would have to plead the fifth because there is no excuse for that level of trading other then inside information.
Does this lead to a larger conspiracy? That is a question that I feel needs to be investigated. Unfortunately, it appears that the individuals who would know the answer to a great number of salient questions, have been obfuscated from public scrutiny. Whether by mistake or malice, that is what has happened.
Published on September 21, 2001, The Washington Times{PUBLICATION2}
FBI expands terrorist hunt into U.S. banks
The FBI's manhunt for the terrorists who attacked America expanded yesterday to U.S. banks, as agents began tracking the money trail of those who financed the scheme, while a multiagency task force investigates whether some of those involved benefited financially in last-minute stock trades.
In seeking to answer the question of how the plot was financed, the FBI asked banks nationwide to search for financial transactions that may have been made by the 19
Associated Press Archive - October 18, 2001
SEC asks companies to cooperate with authorities in terrorism investigations
Federal securities regulators on Thursday asked all U.S. securities businesses to cooperate voluntarily with law-enforcement authorities in their continuing investigations into the Sept. 11 terror attacks. The Securities and Exchange Commission last month asked securities businesses to check their records for accounts held or transactions by any of the suspects in the case identified by the FBI, or by any of the people and organizations with suspected links to terrorism --.
SEC proposes tracking large traders' moves
By Zachary A. Goldfarb
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, April 15, 2010
...
Regulators currently lack easy access to records that show the details of such high-frequency transactions. As a result, they can't determine whether firms are trading rapidly in order to manipulate the market or conceal bad behavior.
The new rule would close this loophole by requiring large traders to register with the SEC. Large traders would be defined as a firm or individual that trades 2 million shares or $20 million in a securities in a day, or 200 million shares or $200 million a month. Registered traders would receive a unique ID, which they would have to provide to their brokerages when they conduct transactions. The brokerages, in turn, would have to submit any data requested by the SEC.
The brokerages, in turn, would have to submit any data
requested by the SEC.
I would gyess that the same people moaning about the lack of information available from theSEC would be first in line to moan about the cost in IT infrastructure for the SEC to record and retain every trade made on a US Exchange.
No, that's not correct.
I think you are reading too much into some of this, Bill.
Take a look at all of the forms the SEC collects. Part of the supplementary documentation that is required would have held the information on these particular trades. That information has been destroyed. I agree that none of this is a smoking gun, but it does merit further investigation. The bottom line is that we looking at paper trail that leads to people who had insider information and made trades on that information. Part of this paper trail was obfuscated, making the whole business harder to pin names to these trades.
A put option isn't something like writing a check. This is a financial transaction that needs to be reported. Especially when one makes millions of dollars from them.
I think you are reading too much into some of this, Bill.
Take a look at all of the forms the SEC collects. Part of the supplementary documentation that is required would have held the information on these particular trades.
The SEC does not track individual transactions. Therefore, they would have no access to such records. They're trying to change that, but they haven't yet. They certainly didn't have it in 2001.
I went through the list. Can't find one. Elucidate me.
You're not going to let boring facts stand in the way...
Yeah, like the fact that the SEC collects the very information that was destroyed. That the SEC has been shown to archive all of its filings. That the SEC has proven itself to be corrupt on many occasions...whatever.
Filings, yes, detailed logs of all transactions, apparently not.