what i say and how to hear it is internal for both you and me. i belive that the martial artist today, especially the FILIPINO martial artists, is so far away from the physcial toughness that can come from training he is very soft on the inside, so he wears his toughness on the outside.
"soft insides"--means, your feelings get hurt easy. take it how you want.
so anyway, my point is not that if you do the art part time you are less of a martial artist than the full time guro. my point is that the filipino art cannot grow with most of our so-called masters being part time masters. they do not have enough time to develop skill to a respectable level, and they have to limit how much teaching they can be for the students, and finally, in our image to the public, we will be seen as only add-on styles, because we treat our arts as add-on arts.
training in an art full time means you are training your arnis/eskrima FULL TIME, not for part of a workout a few times a week, not for a few minutes a day, but a few hours a day. now if one guy practices his strikes 2 hours a day, and the next guy practices two hours a week, there is going to be a huge difference in skill level. this is the difference between average skilled people representing the art, and great skill representing the art. we have too many average skill people calling themselves masters who represent this art.
now the next question is, define skill.
but first we have to ask, skill in what? my definition is skill in striking--power, speed and accuracy, and skill in fighting--ability to land, evade, stop and take shots. everything else is not as important. but to some people, skill means, can he do drills and neat disarmings. well, you can teach a monkey to do sinawali and he will be no different in ability than the average guy/master doing sinawali, except that the monkey will be stronger and less intelligent.
now to answer the question about me having to see every martial artist to make a judgment. no, that is not necessary. i have seen more FMA than most people on this list, and i can tell you that most of what i seen is poor quality, and many of these people are advertise as MASTERS.
so back to my original post, bob hubbard was sad that it seemed the forum came down to a place to post youtube videos and seminar ads, but people are not offering valuable talk about FMA. so i offered some, which in a way is also an explanation to why the FMA is losing popularity, and why there isnt much talk these days about it. the truth is, most FMA people knowledge in these arts i seminar based, part time learning and training, so this is the side dish to karate, kenpo, tae kwon do, kung fu...
And once again, I'm saying that you can't fault someone who chooses to have a regular 40hr/week job and teach a few times a week. You cant expect everyone to run a FT FMA school, saying those people are not any good. Perhaps you can explain just how many hours a week you teach, how many hours per day, from what time to what time, etc. I say this because IMO, even if you claim that you have a school, but are only teaching 2 hrs a few times a day, well, that IMO, does not constitute as being FT. Why? Because if thats what you're doing, you're doing nothing different than the people who teach for 2-3 hours a few times a week, out of their house.
As for this section being slow and quiet...its the same thing in the Kenpo area. Here are a few reasons why:
1) Its not a topic that people want to talk about.
2) Certain people may come on and post, but leave when people start questioning what they say. Personally, I see nothing wrong with asking questions, because thats how people learn.
3) Certain people think theyre above and beyond everyone else, thus they choose not to be bothered by posting.
Perhaps, if you're that concerned about the well being of this section, then you can share some of your infinate wisdom with the rest of us, and start topics on various techniques, etc in the FMAs. IMO, thats more productive than telling someone that they are no good because they dont run a school.