Not to defend "Dr. Laura" but this conversation reminds me of something Mark MacYoung brought up on his page. (
www.nononsenseselfdefense.com)
At least, this is what I got out of it.
He was talking about causes and situations leading up to rape. He was basically saying that many rapists got acquitted in the past because they were found to be "lead on." So that now many people refuse to look at teaching women what not to do, because that is like telling them that the rape in "their fault." As a side effect, now many young women feel justified in playing with fire, so to speak, and enjoy being is "fringe" situations that are exciting, but put themselves in a worse situation for being raped.
It's NOT their fault for being raped, that's 1000% squarely on the shoulders of the rapist. But cause isn't the same as blame.
If you go to the General Self Defense section, and defend your "right" to walk down a dark alley at night, people will counsel you not to. If you get robbed, they are the bad guy, but you would be part of the "cause."
So in regards to men cheating, the cheating men are "wrong," but there are many men who want to be faithful, but the desire isn't strong enough to keep them faithful. It's not the wives
fault if her husband cheats, nor is she to
blame, but she does need to be aware that she could be contributing to the
cause. Does that make sense?
I'm in the middle of dealing with two different men who have been mentally abused by their wives. In one case she is always telling him (publicly) how stupid he is, and what a failure he is, etc. etc. He's not -- he's a sharp, hard-working guy. He works much harder than she does. She does it for a feeling of power. He's put up with it for 7 years, and is beginning to believe it. Now, he
shouldn't cheat on her, but he should get away from her. However, he's stuck in the victim mentality, and is afraid to be by himself now, because he believes the crap she's given him.
Or to flip the situation, a friend of mine got into the same situation as
Sukerkin. Except he married the girl before her "appetite" got out of control. He does realize that he contributed to the problem (they're divorced now), because he took several jobs that took him away from home for weeks at a time, leaving her alone and bored. He knows that it's not his
fault, and that she is responsible for what she did, but he still wonders what would have happened if they had been in a different lifestyle.
So, all that said, I guess I'm just wondering if we will ever get to a point where we can, in a public arena, look at what happens to the victims, and how they could have avoided the situation, without actually blaming the victim?