heretic888
Senior Master
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2002
- Messages
- 2,723
- Reaction score
- 60
loki09789 said:I may not have taken the time to support my assumptions with citations, but I think that some of the other points in political threads (The Hawaii occupation for example, even discussions about Manifest Destiny/Native American treatment) are already there anecdotally to back up my point.
"Manifest Destiny" was an explictly religious principle.
loki09789 said:I wasn't making any comments about politics or human nature actually. That is an assumption on your part.
Actually, your "theorizing" is based on particular assumptions about "human nature" --- whether intentionally believed or not.
loki09789 said:I was theorizing that now that religion has lost its clout as a political power over history, the future 'attrocities' like you were referring to will be done by government bodies - and done with greater efficiency than before due to scientific efficiency.
Okay, this is just silly. You think "religion" has lost all its political power?? Don't suppose you've paid attention to our presidential administration in the past four years??
This might be a shock, but just because a bunch'a French intellectuals started slamming on religion in the 1700's doesn't mean it vanished off the face of the earth in a few decades. It doesn't rule the world anymore, but its still here --- and still motivating people.
Only this time, it has the tools of reason (including industrial-level technology) to do it.
And, if'n you don't think religiouis attrocities are still being conducted by the mainstream Western powers of Church --- then ask your local anthropologist professor what he thinks about missionary work in Africa and South America. I'd say the wholesale destruction of entire self-contained cultures is about as bad as it gets (second only to literal genocide).
Ta ta.