BJJ Techniques for LEOs (includes the clinch):
http://www.defendu.com/10_bjj.htm
http://www.defendu.com/10_bjj.htm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by lvwhitebir
In the national crime statistics, for assaults from strangers, 70% had a single attacker. It went down drastically to 12% for 2 attackers and 5% for three.
For assaults from non-strangers, 91% were from a single attacker, 4% for 2 attackers.
So, while multiple attacker scenarios do exist, they are far from the norm.
The situation you described is a fight and not a self-defense scenario. I would say that if I were attacked, I would try to get away as quickly as possible. I train on the ground to get a dominant position where I can minimize him as a threat and allow me to get away, not to just get an arm-bar or a choke. There are very few arm bars or chokes that I would attempt in a real self-defense scenario because I might lose the dominant position if something goes wrong.
If it were a friend and this were a true fight, I would probably go to the ground and try to immobolize him, rather than mount and beat him to a bloody pulp.
WhiteBirch
Originally posted by cfr
Sorry if this has already been covered. It seems like we often read about "would you go to the ground in a streetfight". Everone has their reasons for and against. But what about getting in the clinch in a streetfight? Would you do it purposely? Do you see a big value in clinch training for street defense?
Look at the end of this fight to see possibilities of close range OUCH!
As I learnt in Aikido size is important, but if you use your center properly you can overcome the difference of size...
If i'm fighting on the street with more than one attacker i would definetly not want a clinch. I would move so that as few people could reach me as possible, by cutting angles and making it difficult for them all to reach me at the same time. But if i get in a clinch i got for vital points on the body so i can concentrate on the next person if i'm fortunate enough to hit the right spot with right amount of pressure.
It depends. Yes.
Most real fights start at close quarters, so a knowledge of the clinch is imperative. If you can control the clinch, you can control the fight. As far as weapons go, they are always a danger (especially up close)
It's a range that you should be familiar with, because, as pknox stated, you will probably end up there. People taking a beating don't hang out in punching range, they disengage or try to grab you. Since you probably won't get a KO right off the bat unless you hit just right, the clinch is a very common place to find yourself in. If you'll notice, most fights that aren't ended in the first few blows end up in a standup wrestling match that is sometimes followed by one or both of the participants going to the ground.
One thing to remember is that most people are very ignorant of the clinch. In terms of layman's combat, punching range is the most comfortable....Landing knees, elbows, and headbutts can end a fight in short order, as can shredding. Your most useful weapons are in the close quarters area, so make use of them.
Though this might be the ideal, the ability to do so will largely depend upon the relative size and strength of the people clinching. I, for example, would not count on my ability to move people around while clinching. At 155, I'm not very well anchored. I'm the kind of guy that should nail my shoes down in a stiff breeze. So, I've developed into a more versatile and agile person, training to be mobile enough to find the advantageous position, rather than get tossed around. However, this predisposes me to going to where the motion leads me, rather than dicatating where we go.If you were to clinch some one, surly you would moved the clinched guy in front of anyone else that is coming your way.