JT_the_Ninja
Black Belt
Agreed, it'd be difficult, but then again, they wouldn't be Clydesdales, either. I'm not saying I believe it 100 percent.Has anyone ever actually figured out just how high you'd have to jump in order to knock an enemy off a reasonable-sized horse? I don't know what the war horses of ancient Korea looked like, but I'm pretty sure they weren't Siberian ponies; they were probably full-size mounts, 15 or 16 hands maybe? And those guys were using saddles and stirrups, as I recall. So you'd have to jump high enough to hit the rider above his center of mass (obviously a kick to the hips in a seated configuration is probably not gonna knock him off)... that means you're having to deliver that kick the full height of the horse's back plus another foot or so. And do so while the guy is cantering past you 10-15 mph...
Has anyone ever seen a single piece of primary documentation for this practice? I'm having a very hard time picturing it!
Also, though, consider that this technique would most certainly not be used while the horse was "cantering past you 10-15 mph," taking into account the move right before is a high block. In palche so, it makes sense that you might be redirecting a spear and then kicking (the horse, maybe?).
In palche deh, though, I think it's pretty obvious that you're grabbing your opponent's arm and rearranging his face with your foot.
But what you're describing sounds very much like a sparring context, not an actual street attack/defense. Faking is probably not the best thing to do as a defensive maneuver in a real fight, because you can't count on the untrained attacker to be carefully assessing your moves and holding back, adjusting and (mis)calculating... that's much more what happens in sparring, I'd say. I don't have a huge amount of experience with violent conflict, but I've had some, and things move way too fast and are too chaotic. If kata are a guide to fighting tactics for real street defense against an untrained aggessor, I myself would probably take the moves they offer as literal, effective strikes.
The interpretations I've seen for kicks in kata that make the most sense to me are kicks in situation where you've established a certain degree of control over the attacker already and so are minimizing the risks involved in the kick. Let's assume that there really are high kick techs the kata record (as vs. later practitioners progressively raising lower kicks to higher ones as the latter became more valued for reasons of spectacle). What conditions would allow you kick high relatively safely while minimizing the chances of your attacker using your kick as an opening to unbalance or close the distance on you to your disadvantage?
It is a human reaction to guard the front, especially the face, when you see an attack coming at you. It is also a male reaction to guard low when you see a kick coming in at waist level or below. It's not that hard to imagine taking advantage of that.
As always, nice vid picks, upnorthkyosa.