punisher73
Senior Master
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2004
- Messages
- 3,959
- Reaction score
- 1,062
No matter how good you are you can't be at full attention all the time. You don't have eyes in the back of your head or Peter Parker's Patented Spider Sense. You can lengthen the odds. You can't eliminate them.
"His attention wavered for a moment. Never let that happen to you!"
"He wasn't constantly whirling around scanning every corner of the room in a defensive crouch!"
"How can we make ourselves absolutely safe from everyone who comes within twenty five feet of us?"
You take the measures that decrease your own reasonable risk as far as you reasonably believe they need to be. Past that there's not much you can do.
Those were along the lines that I was thinking.
To me, and my definitions. I think "armchair quarterbacking" and learning from an incident are two different things. Some of the earlier posts (could have been my mood yesterday) almost read like it wouldn't have happened to them. My point was like Tellner's, there is only so much you can do, and things still happen.
I agree awareness is probably over 90% of avoidance in the first place. But, some people were talking about the attacker saying something to the victim and then the victim turning away totally oblivious. Listen to the victim's statement, there were no words or anything said beforehand. There were no prior clues other than two people walking in at the same time.